期刊文献+

新经济下的共享经济创新与政府管制转型:挑战与因应——“中国的共享经济:为求创新是该继续管制还是放松管制”会议综述 被引量:3

The Innovation of Sharing Economy and Transformation of Government Regulation Under The New Economy: Challenge and Response——A Review on The Conference of Sharing Economy in China: Regulation or Deregulation for Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 共享经济又被称为"分享经济""协同消费经济",与传统经济模式相比,共享经济具有交易主体多元化、客体零散化、模式横向化等特征。伴随网络信息经济与大数据应用,共享经济的创新对传统政府管制模式造成巨大冲击。为此,上海交通大学凯原法学院、Computer Law&Security Review编辑部、南安普顿大学法与互联网研究中心共同主办了"中国的共享经济:为求创新是该继续管制还是放松管制"研讨会,以讨论创新共享经济模式下的政府管制转型问题。此次研讨会对我国转变共享经济管制思维、创新管制手段,具有重要的理论借鉴意义。本文特此梳理三十余位与会专家针对不同产业领域内的共享经济创新激励与政府管制之间的微妙关系的精彩观点,以飨读者。 The sharing economy is also regard as the access economy and c ollaborative consumption economy.Compared with the traditional economy,the sharing economy has three characteristics of the trade parties diversification,the trade objects fragmentation,and the trade modes horizontalization.Along with the application of information economy and big data,the innovation of sharing economy has a huge impact on the traditional government regulatory.In this regard,a highprofile conference on the sharing economy in China co-organized by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University,the Computer Law&Security Review(CLSR)and the University of Southampton which discussed the transformation of government regulation under the innovation mode of sharing economy.The conference has important reference value for China government changing the traditional thinking of the sharing economic regulatory and innovating the administrative supervision methods,and this paper is hereby reviewed the wonderful views of more than 30 experts on the subtle relationship between the sharing economic innovation incentives and government regulatory in different industries.
作者 孙伯龙
出处 《竞争政策研究》 2018年第3期46-53,共8页 Competition Policy Research
关键词 共享经济 政府管制 创新激励 平台责任 管制转型 Sharing Economy Government Regulation Innovation Incentive Platform Responsibility Regulatory Transformation Policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献76

  • 1邓晰隆,陈娟.“公共政策选择性执行”问题及其对策研究[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2006(4):55-57. 被引量:11
  • 2苏添.论网络交易平台提供商的民事法律责任[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2005,7(4):76-80. 被引量:37
  • 3[古希腊]亚里士多德.《政治学》,吴寿彭译,商务印书馆1997年版,第178页.
  • 4See SARAH CANNON & LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS, HOW UBER AND THE SHARING ECONOMY CAN WIN OVER REGULATORS, at http ://blogs. hbr. org/2014/10/how uber andthe sharing economy can win over regulators ( Last visited on Oct. 13, 2014).
  • 5See RACHEL BOTSMAN, THE SHARING ECONOMY LACKS A SHARED DEFINITION, at http://www, fastcoexist, com/3022028/the sharing economy lacks ashared definition (Last visited on Nov. 21, 2013).
  • 6ANDREW LEONARD, "SHARING ECONOMY" SHAMS: DECEPTION AT THE CORE OF THE INTERNET' S HOTTEST BUSINESSES, at http://www, salon, com/2014/03/14/sharing economy shams deception at the core of the internets hottest businesses (Last visited on Mar. 14, 2014).
  • 7See Steven C. Hackett, Heterogeneities, Information, and Conflict Resolution: Experimental Evidence on Sharing Contracts, 6 J. THEORETICAL POL. 495, 495 - 97 (1994).
  • 8See Amy Kristin Sanders & Natalie Christine Olsen, Re-Defining Defamation : Psychological Sense of Community in the Age of the Internet, 17 COMM. L. & POL'Y,355 ,356 - 365 (2012).
  • 9See David Schleicher, The City as a Law and Economic Subject, 2010 U. ILL. L. REV. 1507~, 1558 (2010).
  • 10See MICHELLE REGNER, HOW THE WORLD' S BIGGEST BRANDS CAME TO LOVE THE SHARING ECONOMY, at http://www, virgin, corn/entrepreneur/how the worlds biggestbrands came to love the sharing economy (Last visited on June 30, 2014).

共引文献689

同被引文献47

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部