期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术治疗胆结石的临床效果观察 被引量:10

Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of gallstones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨和分析在胆结石患者中开腹手术、腹腔镜胆囊切除术的治疗效果。方法此次抽取2012年1月~2017年12月在医院治疗的胆结石患者(22例)当做分析的对象,按入院顺序分乙组和甲组,每组11例。乙组患者采用经开腹手术进行治疗,甲组患者经腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行治疗。对两组患者的手术情况、手术效果、并发症情况、术后恢复情况进行总结。结果乙组患者术中出血量以及手术时间均大于甲组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);乙组患者手术有效率小于甲组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);乙组患者并发症的总发生率大于甲组患者,但差异无统计学意义;乙组患者下床时间、排气时间、住院时间均长于甲组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在胆结石患者中,腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用效果要明显好于开腹手术,患者经腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗时,出血量低、手术时间短、手术有效率高、并发症少、排气时间短、下床时间短、住院时间短。 Objective To explore and analyze the therapeutic effect of laparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallstone patients.Meth?ods A total of 22 cases of cholelithiasis(22 cases)treated in our hospital from December to January 2012 were selected as the object of analysis.The patients were divided into group B and group A according to the order of admission,with 11 cases in each group.The study group B was treated by laparotomy.The study of group A was treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.The operation,the effect,the complications and the postoperative recovery were summarized.Results The blood loss and operative time in group B were significantly higher than those in group A,with a significant difference(P<0.05).The operative efficiency of group B was less than that of group A,with a significant difference(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in group B was higher than that in group A,but the difference was not significant.The time of getting out of bed,exhaust time and length of stay in group B were longer than those in group A,with a significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion In patients with cholelithiasis,the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than that of laparotomy.Patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy have low bleeding,short operation time,high operative rate,less complications,short time of exhaust,short time to get out of bed and shorter residence time.
作者 王安江 张令宇 张真真 付志强 Wang Anjiang;Zhang Lingyu;Zhang Zhenzhen;Fu Zhiqiang(XinJiang Shihezi Economic and Technological Development Zone Hospital Surgery,Shihezi,XinJiang,832000,China)
出处 《当代医学》 2018年第23期61-63,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 胆结石 开腹手术 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 临床效果 Gallstone Laparotomy Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献61

  • 1程建国,霞明,文峰,黄继征,朱杰伦,章涛.内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并胆管结石临床分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(7):2110-2112. 被引量:16
  • 2郑民华,主编.普通外科腹腔镜手术操作规范与指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:25.
  • 3陈孝平,汪建平.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
  • 4Wu XS, Shi LB, Gu J, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecys- tectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopie cholecystectomy:a meta- analysis of randomized clinical trials [ J]. J Laparoendoscopic Ad- vanced Surgical Techniques,2013,23 ( 3 ) : 183 - 191.
  • 5毕洁亮,张卫华.通腑泻热灌肠合剂促进腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胃肠功能恢复的临床观察[c].中华中医药学会外科分会、山东中医药学会外科专业委员会2008年中医外科学术年会论文集,2008:294-296.
  • 6Ikeda N,Ueno M,Kanamura T,et al. Safety and feasibility for sin- gle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospi- tal: A retrospective comparison with conventional 4 - port laparo- scopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Sechniques,2013,23 ( 1 ) :33 - 36.
  • 7高志强.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术85例临床分析[C].第四届中国武汉国际微创外科学术研讨会论文集,2009:245-247.
  • 8刘锦新,韩伟,陈海.微创保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效对比[J].中国普通外科杂志,2009,18(3):303-305. 被引量:38
  • 9高富元,张克君,朱东明.腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症回顾及预防[J].中国医学创新,2010,7(5):67-68. 被引量:29
  • 10刘培万,保红平,李奎,高瑞岗,方登华.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏的临床分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2010,15(3):215-217. 被引量:24

共引文献293

同被引文献98

引证文献10

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部