摘要
"社会物流成本占GDP的比重"是国内外衡量社会物流成本与竞争力的常用指标,另外也有学者提出采用"社会物流成本占社会物流总额的比重"这一指标,但这两类指标受产业结构等因素的影响较大,用它们来衡量不同经济体之间或同一经济体在产业结构优化调整时期不同时点之间的社会物流成本和竞争力均存在一定的弊端。为消除产业结构的影响,可以从"基于物流需求视角"的新方法出发来对社会物流成本与竞争力加以衡量,即社会物流成本/物流需求类产业(行业)产值。利用我国近十年的时序数据分析后发现,新衡量方法得到的指标值与"剔除产业结构影响因素"方法得到的指标值高度相关,用此方法对中美社会物流成本进行对比分析,发现新视角下中美社会物流成本"对比值"基本相当,因此未来可考虑进一步分析各个细分物流成本,并有针对性地确定降低社会物流成本的方向。
"The proportion of social logistics cost in GDP"is a common index to measure the social logistics cost and competitiveness at home and abroad.In addition,some scholars put forward the index of"the proportion of social logistics cost in total value of social logistics goods".But these two indexes are greatly influenced by the industrial structure and other factors,and there are some drawbacks when using them to measure the differences of the social logistics cost and competitiveness between different economies or different times in the period of optimization and adjustment of industrial structure in the same economy.After the analysis of"eliminating the affecting factors of industrial structure",the new method is proposed to measure the social logistics cost and competitiveness from"the perspective of logistics demand".According to the time series data of China for the last ten years,it is found that the index values obtained by the two new methods are highly correlated.Considering that the second method is more convenient,from the perspective of logistics demand,the social logistics costs of China and USA are compared and analyzed,and the conclusion is drawn that the"contrast value"of the social logistics cost between China and USA is basically equivalent in the new perspective.It also puts forward the thinking that the social logistics cost should be further compared in the case of subdivision,and give more specific ideas to reduce the logistics cost in China.
作者
崔晓迪
CUI Xiao-di(Tianjin University of Technology and Education,Tianjin300222,China)
出处
《中国流通经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第9期11-19,共9页
China Business and Market
关键词
社会物流成本
竞争力
产业结构
物流需求
衡量指标
中美对比
social logistics cost
competitiveness
industrial structure
logistics demand
index
comparison between China and USA