摘要
依据强调整体性还是个体性可以将总括副词分为两类,强调整体性的"全"类副词与程度副词存在语义适应性,故而经历了"范围→程度"的演变,强调个体性的"皆"类副词没有。"毕"虽然兼有强调整体性与强调个体性两种用法,但以强调个体性的用法为主,故亦未产生程度义。表限定的范围副词都不具有凸显整体性这一语义特征,自然也不能产生程度义。范围到程度的演变,从结果来看属于隐喻,故而存在整齐的语义对应性:总括——高程度;从过程来看则属于转喻。
According to emphasize the whole or individual,the generalizing scope adverbs can be divided into two categories,one is“quan”(全)adverbs which emphasize the semantic integrity and adapt to degree adverbs,the other is“jie”(皆)adverbs that emphasize the individual.Therefore,“quan”adverbs had the semantic evolution path of scope to degree with the“jie”adverbs had not.Although had the two semantic features,“bi”(毕)did not has the semantic evolution path of scope to degree with the reason that their main usages were emphasizing the individual.Part scope adverbs and limited adverbs all did not have the semantic features of emphasizing the whole,therefore the evolution path did not exist.The result of the evolution path belongs to metaphor with the Process to metonymy.
作者
李小军
Li Xiaojun(School of language and Literature,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330022;Language and Language Life Research Center,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330022)
出处
《语言科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期520-529,共10页
Linguistic Sciences
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(15ZDB100)和重点项目(15AYY010)阶段成果
关键词
范围
程度
整体性
语义演变
scope
degree
integrity
semantic evolution
