期刊文献+

新高考选考科目计分问题与政策调适 被引量:6

The Scoring of Elective Subjects in the New Gaokao Reform:Predicaments and Policy Adjustment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2014年以来,新高考已在全国6个省(市)展开试点。政策分析发现,多数试点地区的选考科目计分政策设计不能适应考生群体结构的变化。在"总分录取"的招生政策下,统考科目与选考科目成绩直接相加的科学性值得反思。考试可比性的理论与实践表明,量表化方法能够实现不同选考科目的可比性。应以海南计分政策改革为契机,探索适合新高考科目设置的"量表化"计分改进研究。应参照国内外分数合成经验,积极调适"总分录取"政策,为科学合成分数创造有利条件。 Since 2014,the new Gaokao reform has been piloted in six provinces(cities).The policy analysis reveals that the design of the elective subject scoring policy in most pilot areas could not adapt to the changes in the candidate group structure.As for the"total score admission"policy,the scientific issues concerning the direct adding up of compulsory and elective subject scores will be worthy of reflection.The theory and practice based on the comparability of exams show that scaling can achieve comparison of different subjects.The Hainan scoring policy reform should be taken as an opportunity to explore the scaling improvement research suitable for setting examinational subjects of new Gaokao reform.It is necessary to refer to the experience of score summation at home and abroad to actively adjust the"total score admission"policy and create favorable conditions for scientific score summation.
作者 王森 WANG Sen(Faculty of Education/ National Institutes of Educational Policy Research,East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
出处 《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期89-95,共7页 Fudan Education Forum
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学重大招标课题"适应新高考要求的普通高中学业水平考试和综合素质评价实施策略研究"(VHAl50003) 国家教育宏观政策研究院2018年博士生专项课题A档资助"新高考网络舆情与引导机制研究"(201802007S)
关键词 新高考 计分 量表化 分数合成 政策调适 New Gaokao Reform Scoring Scaling Score Summation Policy Adjustment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1Kolen MJ,,Brennan R L.Test equating:Methods and practices[]..1995
  • 2Lord,F. M. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems . 1980
  • 3Kolen,M.J,Brennan,R.L.Test equating,linking,and scaling:Methods andpractices[]..2004
  • 4Angoff,W.A.,Thorndike,R.L.Scales, norms, and equivalent scores[].Educational Measurement.1971
  • 5Weimo,Zhu.Test equating : what, why, how?[].Research Quarterly.1998
  • 6Hambleton R K,Swaminathan H,Rogers H J.Fundamentals of item response theory[]..1991
  • 7Haebara,T.Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted least squares method[].Japanese Psychological Research.1980
  • 8Stocking,M. L.,Lord,F. M.Developing a common metric in item response theory[].Applied Psychology.1983
  • 9Harris,D.J,Crouse,J.D.A study of criteria used in equating[].Applied Measurement in Education.1993
  • 10Brennan R L,Kolen M J.Some practical issues in equating[].APM.1987

同被引文献83

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部