科学计量学迎接新挑战与新机遇——2018科学计量与科技评价天府论坛综述被引量：8

Scientometrics Meets New Challenges and Opportunities——Postscript on 2018 Tianfu Forum on Scientometrics & Evaluation

下载PDF

导出

摘要 "2018科学计量与科技评价天府论坛"于2018年9月在成都召开,来自全国各地60余家高校和科研机构的240余名科研人员、师生围绕科学计量与科技评价领域的国际研究进展和前沿发展动向展开了交流和讨论。文章从理论与方法的不断深入、广泛的实践应用、发展机遇与挑战等三个方面,讨论和分析了在大数据时代科学计量学与科技评价发展的新挑战和新机遇,以期揭示科学计量学研究与科技评价工作的发展现状和未来发展图景。 The 2018 Tianfu Forum on Scientometrics&Evaluation was held in Chengdu from September 19 to 21,2018.More than 240 researchers,teachers and students from more than 60 universities and scientific research institutions had attended this forum.The international research progress and frontier development trends have been exchanged and discussed.This paper discusses the new challenges and new opportunities in the development of scientometrics in the era of big data from three aspects,which are the deepening of theory and methods,extensive practical application,development opportunities and challenges.The main contribution of this paper to the field of scientometrics is providing a view to clearly presenting future of scientometrics research and scientific evaluation.

作者陈云伟张志强

机构地区中国科学院成都文献情报中心科学计量与科技评价研究中心

出处《图书与情报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期134-140,共7页 Library & Information

基金国家社会科学基金重点项目"面向领域知识发现的学科信息学理论与应用研究"(项目编号:17ATQ008) 中国科学院政策调研课题"国际科技发展态势趋势分析研究"(项目编号:ZYS-2018-07) 中国科学院战略研究与决策支持系统建设专项项目"重要科技领域与科研机构规划理论方法与应用研究"(项目编号:GHJ-ZLZX-2017-31)研究成果之一

关键词科学计量科技评价科学计量与科技评价天府论坛大数据时代 scientometrics evaluation Tianfu Forum on scientometrics & evaluation big data

分类号 G250.252 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1陈云伟,邓勇,陈方,丁陈君,郑颖,刘春江,方曙.复合合作强度指数构建及应用研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(13):96-103. 被引量：14
2田雅娟,张志强,陶诚,杨明,巴金,陈云伟.全球碳纤维技术发展分析及其对我国的启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2018,40(4):343-354. 被引量：9
3张志强,陈云伟,陶诚,徐婧,田倩飞.基于文献计量的量子信息研究国际竞争态势分析[J].世界科技研究与发展,2018,40(1):37-49. 被引量：14
4王雪梅,张志强,马明国.中国地球科学研究的世界贡献及其时空变化[J].中国科学基金,2018,32(3):328-335. 被引量：4
5李江.科学中的“睡美人”与“昙花一现”现象评述[J].大学图书馆学报,2016,34(3):38-43. 被引量：16

二级参考文献78

1Guimer~ R, Uzzi B, Spira J, et al. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance [ J]. Science,2005, 308 (5722) :697 - 702.
2Whitfield J. Collaboration: Group theory [ J ]. Nature, 2008, 455 (7214) :720 -723.
3Wuchty S, Jones B F, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[ J ]. Science,2007, 316 ( 5827 ) .. 1036 - 1039.
4Panzarasa P, Opsahl T. Patterns of scientific collaboration in busi- ness and management: The effects of network structure and inter- disciplinarity on research performance [ EB/OL ]. [ 2014 - 03 - 08 ]. http://www, ifr. ac. uk/netsci08/Download/CT Abstracts/ CT314. pdf.
5Abramo G, D' angelo C A, Solazzi M. The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationaliza- tion of their research [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86 ( 3 ) : 629 - 643.
6Kato M, Ando A. The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(3) :535 -553.
7Palla G, BarabOsi A L, Viesek T. Quantifying social group evolu- tion[ J~. Nature,2007, 446(7136) :664 -667.
8Lin Lili, Xu Zhuoming, Ding Ying, et al. Finding topic-level ex- perts in scholarly networks [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2013,97 ( 3 ) :797 -819.
9Melin G, Persson O. Studying research collaboration using co-au- thorships [ J ]. Scientometries, 1996, 36 ( 3 ) : 363 - 377.
10Otte E, Rousseau R. Social network analysis : A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences [ J ]. Journal of Information Sci- ence,2002, 28(6) : 441 -453..