期刊文献+

美国经贸单边主义:形式、动因与法律应对 被引量:20

The US Economic Unilateralism:Forms,Motivations and Legal Countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 自特朗普执政以来,美国通过阻碍多边争端解决机制运转、以互惠待遇取代非歧视原则、强化国内法对国际法约束等单边主义行为,加速破坏以规则为导向的现行国际经贸体制。多边经贸协定文本与实践发展脱节、争端解决机制缺乏有效性、成员方对市场经济模式的理解缺乏共识,是美国经贸单边主义兴起的动因。美国经贸单边主义威胁多边机制正常运转,引发国际法治危机。为应对此种单边主义行为,世贸组织成员应有效发挥多数票决制度的功能,并强化多边规则对双边或区域协定的纪律约束。作为负责任大国,中国应坚持以完善公平竞争条件为基础发展市场经济,并以多边主义方法推动世贸组织改革。 After Donald Trump became the U.S.President,the U.S.has not only hindered the operation of multilateral dispute settlement mechanism,but also advocated the replacement of non-discriminatory treatment doctrine with reciprocal treatment,and continued to strengthen the restraint of international law by domestic law.These unilateral economic measures have undermined the rule-oriented international economic order.The conflict between WTO agreement and current trade practices,the ineffectiveness of the dispute settlement mechanism,and the lack of consensus on the“market economy mode”are the reasons why the U.S.blocks WTO.In practice,the US economic unilateralism is threatening the functioning of multilateral mechanism and triggering an international rule of law crisis.To meet the challenges posed by the U.S.,the international community should give full play to the majority voting system in the WTO decision-making procedure,and strengthen the disciplinary constraints on bilateral or regional trade agreements.As a responsible big power,China should improve its market economy on the basis of fair competitive conditions and actively promote WTO reform by adhering to multilateralism.
作者 孙南翔 Sun Nanxiang
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期179-192,共14页 Global Law Review
基金 作者主持的2018年度国家社会科学基金青年项目"国际裁决的合宪性问题研究"(18CFX015)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献116

  • 1托尼.史密斯,张琦.马克思理论体系中世界市场的地位[J].政治经济学评论,2005(2):162-182. 被引量:6
  • 2约翰.卡西迪,童建挺.马克思的回归[J].马克思主义与现实,1998,50(5):61-64. 被引量:6
  • 3李吟枫.世界市场的形成及历史作用[J].世界历史,1986(2):1-11. 被引量:6
  • 4孙来斌.马克思世界市场思想概述[J].当代世界与社会主义,2006(4):39-43. 被引量:7
  • 5Oscar Schachter, The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements, 71 American Journal of International Law 296, 301 ( 1977 ).
  • 6Jessica Liang, Modifying the UN charter through Subsequent Practice: Prospects for the Charter' s Revitalization, 81 Nordic Journal of lnternational Law 1, 4 -5 (2012).
  • 7Richard K. Gardiner, Treaty Interpretation, Oxford, 2008, p. 225.
  • 8Hersch Lauterpacht, International Law: The General Works, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1,1970, p. 129.
  • 9Georg Nolte, Treaties over time in particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice, Annex A, U. N. Doe. A/63/10, 2008, para. 5.
  • 10Christopher Peters, Subsequent Practice and Established Practice of International Organizations: Two Sides of the Same Coin, 3 Goettingen Journal oflnternational Law 617, 618 (2011).

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部