期刊文献+

程序正义视野下监察证据规则的审查 被引量:21

Reviewing Rules Governing Supervision Evidence from the Perspective of Procedural Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代证据规则的构造既要从认识论层面理解证据与事实之间的主观因果关系,又要从价值论层面贯彻当事人主义的程序正义理念。为实现独立监察的目标设定,《监察法》确立了以监察为中心的证据规则,有效地集中了反腐资源、提升了反腐效率。然而,选择性吸收《刑事诉讼法》部分内容所形成的监察证据规则,存在虚置证据转化机制、过分倚赖言词证据以及排除非法证据不充分等有违程序正义的法治隐忧。为重塑监察证据规则的法治模式,一方面要借由发挥《监察法》第33条第2款的"委任性功能",制定监察立法的实施细则,以刑事审判为标准补正监察证据规范的内容;另一方面要通过对刑事程序与实体立法的必要调整,塑造监察证据收集、固定、审查和运用的过程监督以及刑事责任机制。 In building the rules governing the collection and use of evidence at present,we should not only understand the subjective causality between the evidence and the facts at the epistemological level,but should also carry out the principle of procedural justice embodied in the adversary system at the axiological level.In order to ensure independent supervision,the Supervision Law establishes the rules of evidence which are centered on the supervision process.This has effectively concentrated the anti-corruption resources and improved the efficiency of anti-corruption activities.However,selectively absorbing the rules of evidence from the Criminal Procedure Law has the risks of violating the principle of procedural justice required by rule of law:for example,neglecting the evidence conversion mechanism,excessively relying on verbal evidence and inadequately excluding illegal evidence.In order to reshape the legal model of the rules governing supervision evidence,on the one hand,we should use the“delegation function”entailed by Provision 2 of Article 32 in the Supervision Law to formulate detailed rules governing supervision legislation and take criminal trial as the standard to make up for the possible inadequacies in the content of the rules governing supervision evidence.On the other hand,we should adjust the criminal procedure and substantive legislation so as to regulate the process of collecting,confirming,reviewing and using the evidence for supervision and to shape the mechanism of determining criminal liability.
作者 夏伟 刘艳红 XIA Wei;LIU Yanhong
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期117-129,共13页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 2018年东南大学中央基本业务经费资助项目(2242018S30029) 江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地"反腐败法治研究中心"项目(2015JDXM004)研究成果
关键词 法治反腐 认识-价值二元论 证据规则 程序正义 law-based anti-corruption epistemological and axiological dualism rules of evidence procedural justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献254

共引文献757

引证文献21

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部