期刊文献+

不同机用镍钛器械在树脂模拟根管内成形能力的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of the shaping ability of different nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals in resin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3种机用镍钛器械在预备树脂模拟弯曲根管时的成形能力,以期为临床提供参考。方法将48个树脂模拟弯曲根管随机分为4组,每组12个,分别使用F360(组1)、F6 SkyTaper(20/06)(组2)、F6 SkyTaper(25/06)(组3)、Reciproc R25(组4)进行根管预备,使用体视显微镜拍摄预备前后的根管图像,利用Photoshop软件进行图像重叠,以根尖孔为圆心,每隔1 mm作一同心圆,测量根管内外侧壁树脂去除量,计算中心定位能力。使用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计学分析。结果在距根尖孔1 mm位点,组4的偏移程度为(0.10±0.03)mm,显著大于组2的(0.05±0.03)mm和组3的(0.05±0.03)mm(P <0.05);在距根尖孔8 mm和9mm处,组4的偏移程度分别为(0.12±0.06)mm、(0.13±0.05)mm,显著大于组2的(0.05±0.05)mm、(0.05±0.05)mm和组3的(0.05±0.04)mm、(0.06±0.05)mm(P <0.05);在距根尖孔10 mm处,组4的偏移程度为(0.13±0.06)mm,显著大于组2的(0.06±0.06)mm(P <0.05)。结论 F6 SkyTaper相对于Reciproc的中心定位能力更好,可以在根管预备过程中更好的保持树脂弯曲根管的原始形态。 Objective To compare the shaping ability of 3 different nickel(Ni)-titanium(Ti)systems in simulated root canals in resin and to provide a reference for clinicians.Methods Forty-eight resin blocks were prepared using the F360(Komet,Brasseler GmbH & Co.,Lemgo,Germany)(Group 1),F6 SkyTaper(20/06)(Komet,Brasseler GmbH & Co.,Lemgo,Germany)(Group 2),F6 SkyTaper(25/06)(Komet,Brasseler GmbH & Co.,Lemgo,Germany)(Group 3)and Reciproc R25 systems(VDW,Munich,Germany)(Group 4)(n=12 canals/group).The images taken before and after preparation were superimposed and analyzed by Adobe Photoshop v7.0.The amount of resin removed by each system was measured,and the centering ability was assessed.The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0.Results At the 1 mm point,the transportation in Group 4 [(0.10±0.03)mm] was significantly greater than that in Groups 2 [(0.05±0.03)mm] and 3 [(0.05±0.03)mm](P<0.05).At the 8 mm and 9 mm points,the transportation values in Group 4 [(0.12±0.06)mm and(0.13±0.05)mm] were significantly higher than those in Groups 2 [(0.05±0.05)mm and(0.05±0.05)mm] and 3 [(0.05±0.04)mm and(0.06±0.05)mm](P<0.05).At the 10 mm point,the transportation was significantly greater in Group 4 [(0.13±0.06)mm] than in Group 2 [(0.06±0.06)mm].Conclusion F6 SkyTaper exhibits better centering ability than Reciproc.
作者 张笑维 梁景平 孙喆 ZHANG Xiaowei;LIANG Jingping;SUN Zhe(Department of Endodontics,Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology,National Clinical Research Center of Stomatology,Shanghai 200011,China)
出处 《口腔疾病防治》 2019年第2期95-99,共5页 Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81271133)
关键词 镍钛器械 树脂根管 弯曲根管 根管预备 成形能力 Nickel-titanium instruments Simulated root canals in resin Curved root canal Root canal preparation Shaping ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Liu SB, Fan B, Cheung GS, et al. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile[J]. Am J Dent, 2006, 19(6):353-358.
  • 2Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, et al. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three enginedriven instrumentation techniques[J]. Int Endod J, 2001, 34(5):354-358.
  • 3Fu M, Zhang Z, Hou B. Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome [J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(5):619-622.
  • 4De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, et al. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(12):1063-1068.
  • 5Park SK, Kim YJ, Shon WJ, et al. Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy[J]. Scanning, 2013. doi:10.1002/sca.21096.
  • 6Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971, 32(2):271-275.
  • 7Zhang C, Huang W, Sun Z, et al. A comparison of two guttapercha master points consisting of different phases in filling of artificial lateral canals and depressions in the apical region of root canals when using a warm vertical compaction technique[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(11):1041-1046.
  • 8Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations[J]. Int Endod J, 2008, 41(4):339-344.
  • 9Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2012, 37(4):220-227.
  • 10Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(11):1589-1593.

共引文献30

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部