摘要
为了解决城乡建设用地不合理的"双增长"和农民进城后宅基地闲置低效利用日益严重的问题,探索和建立宅基地有偿退出机制已成为宅基地制度改革的重要任务。在梳理宅基地有偿退出相关政策的基础上,对2015年以来部分试点地区的实践进行总结,主要有置换式、变现式和收储式三种模式,不同模式的实施目标与成效、主导方和补偿资金来源、实施对象、基本特征均存在差异。未来推进农村宅基地有偿退出须建立农村宅基地地价评估制度、引导和激励有条件的农民先行退出、规范宅基地有偿退出程序及建立宅基地有偿退出长效机制。
In order to solve the unreasonable “double growth”of urban and rural construction land and the increasingly serious problem of inefficient use of homestead after the farmers entering into cities, the exploration and establishment of the compensated withdrawal mechanism for homestead has become an important mission of the homestead system reform. Based on the relevant policies combing of homestead withdraw with compensation, this paper summarizes several types of practice in some pilot areas since 2015, which include the three models of replacement, change and storage. There are differences in these models, including the implementation goals and effectiveness, leading parties and source of compensation fund, implementation object and basic characteristics. In the future, it is necessary to establish the evaluation system of rural homestead price, guide and encourage qualified farmers to quit their homestead first, regulate the procedures of compensated withdrawal of homestead and establish the long-term mechanism of compensated exit of homestead.
作者
张勇
ZHANG Yong(School of Finance and Public Management, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, Anhui 233030;Public Administration Postdoctoral Research Station of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)
出处
《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期83-89,共7页
Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(15CJY047)
安徽财经大学科学研究基金资助项目(ACKY1814ZDB)
江苏省国土资源科技项目(KJXM2018009)
关键词
宅基地有偿退出
政策梳理
实践比较
退出制度
rural homestead withdraw with compensation
policy combing
practice comparison
withdraw system
