摘要
先秦诸子的"用贤"思想以儒、墨、法三家最具代表性,在对儒、墨、法三家"用贤"思想探究的基础上,比较分析了三家"用贤"的范围、原则、标准、内容。结果表明:儒家举贤的标准主要注重伦理道德,而相比之下墨家、法家更强调贤才的能力;儒家举贤偏向于氏族制度范围,而墨家、法家用贤范围更强调唯贤是举;在贤才的待遇上儒家强调重义轻利,而墨家、法家则注重对贤才的物质和精神激励。
Confucianism,Mohism and Legalists are mostly represent of using talents of the thinkers in the pre-Qin period.Thus,this paper focuses attention on the recommending and appointing worthy thoughts of Confucianism,Mohism and Legalists and their range,principles,criterion and contents are compared and analyzed.The results indicated that the standard of recommending and appointing worthy in Confucianism mainly pay attention to ethics,and Mohism and Legalists emphasize more on abilities of worthy compared with Confucianism.Confucianism is in favor of Clan system scope,however,Mohism and Legalists place much more stress on talented personnel.Confucianism contends that worthy should value justice above material gains on treatment while Mohism and Legalists claim that material awards and spirit incentive are necessary to worthy.
作者
毛国旭
Mao Guoxu(School of Marxism,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming Yunnan 650224,China)
出处
《西南林业大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2017年第5期31-35,共5页
Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Social Sciences)
关键词
儒家
墨家
法家
贤才
比较
Confucianism
Mohism
Legalism
talents
comparison
