摘要
对于南沙群岛的自然人文景观,中文文献记载内容翔实,且涉及多方面,展现了中国渔民的生计、生活与岛屿的开发建设紧密相连的过程,凸显了中国人的主体地位与所形成的历史性所有权。这与英美文献以航海为目的的"线性"记述、日法"探险"和侵占的"时段性"描述相比,性质和内涵完全不同。"南海仲裁案"在南沙群岛人类居住的"事实认定"上,既不引用中国渔民的资料阐述群岛人居环境,也不结合实地情况探究渔民的生活习性,其认知偏离南沙群岛历史轨迹。
For the natural and man-made landscape in Nansha islands, the Chinese documents were detailed and involved many aspects. It showed that the livelihood and life of Chinese fishermen were closely linked to the development and construction of the islands, highlighting the Chinese people’s main position and historical ownership. In nature and connotation, this was totally different from the “linear” descriptions of the Anglo-American documents for the purpose of navigation, and Japanese and French “expeditions” and the descriptions of “periodicity” of occupation.“The South China Sea Arbitration” on the “fact finding” of human habitation in the Nansha islands, neither cited the data of Chinese fishermen to explain the living environment of the islands, nor explored the living habits of the fishermen in the light of the situation in the field, so the recognition was deviated from the historical track of the Nansha islands.
作者
郭渊
GUO Yuan(Institute of Sino-foreign Relations,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
出处
《海南热带海洋学院学报》
2018年第6期1-5,50,共6页
Journal of Hainan Tropical Ocean University
基金
国家社会科学基金"维护国家海洋权益"专项(17VHQ005)
关键词
文献
南沙群岛
自然人文景观
“南海仲裁案”
documents
Nansha islands
natural and man-made landscape
“The South China Sea Arbitration”
