摘要
目的本次实验将传统的肛门高位治疗方法与低位切开高位虚挂线术进行对比,探讨低位切开高位虚挂线术对高位肛瘘的治疗效果。方法选取280例高位肛瘘患者作为研究对象,将其分为观察组和对照组。对照组患者采用传统的治疗方法。观察组采用低位切开高位虚挂线术。在治疗完成后,对两组患者采用患者肛门功能评价表,调察本次治疗对其肛门的影响,探讨本次实验主题。结果观察组术后Kelly评分(5.4±0.8)分,对照组组Kelly评分(3.1±0.2)分,对照组评分低于观察组,差异具有统计学意义(t=33.001,P=0.000);观察组治愈率为95.7%,高于对照组的87.9%,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论低位切开高位虚挂线术,是传统的高位肛瘘的治疗方法,经实验证实,此治疗方法治疗效果显著,并对肛门功能影响小。
Objective In this experiment,the traditional high anal treatment method was compared with low incision and high false thread hanging operation,and the therapeutic effect of low incision and high false thread hanging operation on high anal fistula was discussed.Methods 280 cases of high anal fistula were selected as the research object and divided into observation group and control group.The patients in the control group were treated with traditional methods.The observation group was treated with low incision and high thread-drawing.After the completion of the treatment,two groups of patients were assessed with the patient's anal function evaluation table to investigate the effect of this treatment on their anus,and to explore the subject of this experiment.Results The Kelly score of the observation group(5.4±0.8)points was lower than that of the control group(3.1±0.2)points.The difference was statistically significant(t=33.001,P=0.000).The cure rate of the observation group was 95.7%,higher than 87.9%of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Low incision and high thread-drawing is a traditional method for the treatment of high anal fistula.It has been proved by experiments that this method is effective and has little effect on anal function.
作者
王浩
WANG Hao(Anorectal Department,Inner Mongolia InternationalMongolian Medicine Hospital,Hohhot Inner Mongolia 010065,China)
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2019年第9期82-84,共3页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
低位切开
高位虚挂线
手术
高位肛瘘
肛门功能
影响分析
low incision
high virtual hang line
surgery
high anal fistula
the anus function
the impact analysis
