期刊文献+

预后营养指数评估局部进展期结直肠癌预后的价值 被引量:5

Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Predicting Prognosis of Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨预后营养指数(PNI)对局部进展期结直肠癌者预后的评估价值。方法:收集400例2013年1月~2018年4月行结直肠癌根治术并经病理确诊为Ⅱ~Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者临床资料,所有入组患者从手术结束随访至失访、或死亡;计算PNI指数,使用分类变量(χ~2),单向ANOVA(正态分布)或Kruskal-Wallis H(偏斜分布)分析不同PNI组(低值、中值、高值组)之间基线特征的分布差异;使用单变量和广义Cox回归模型评估暴露因素与结果的相关性,使用Cox比例风险回归模型分析PNI对局部进展期结直肠癌预后价值。结果:Cox回归单变量及多变量模型分析发现,PNI与局部进展期结直肠癌并行结直肠癌根治切除术的死亡率无关(OR=0. 88,95%CI为0. 78~1. 00);线性回归模型分析发现PNI与结直肠癌患者死亡为非线性相关,当PNI≤41. 35时,PNI每增加一个单位,患者死亡的风险降低68%;当PNI> 41. 35,即使PNI再增加,也无法进一步降低患者死亡率; PNI中值组累积总生存率显著高于PNI低值组(P=0. 028),在一定范围内(PNI为26~41),PNI是死亡风险的独立保护因素。结论:PNI值具有一定预测局部进展期结直肠癌根治性切除术后预后的价值,PNI在26~41范围是进展期结直肠癌根治性切除术后死亡风险的独立保护因素。 Objective:To investigate the value of prognostic nutritional index(PNI)in predicting prognosis in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.Methods:The clinical information of 400 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical resection of colorectal cancer from January 2013 to April 2018 and were pathologically diagnosed asⅡ~Ⅲstage colorectal cancer were collected.All patients in the group were followed up from the end of the operation to the loss of follow-up or death.The PNI index was calculated and the distribution differences of baseline characteristics between different PNI groups(low value,median value and high value group)were analyzed by using categorical variables(χ^2),one-way ANOVA(normal distribution)or Kruskal-Wallis H(skew distribution).Univariate and generalized Cox regression models were used to assess the association between exposure factors and outcomes.In addition,Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the prognostic value of PNI in locally advanced colorectal cancer.Results:Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that PNI was not associated with mortality in locally progressive colorectal cancer patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal cancer(OR=0.88,95%CI,0.78~1.00).Linear regression model analysis found that the correlation between PNI and colorectal cancer patients was non-linear.When PNI was no more than 41.35,the risk of death was reduced by 68%for each additional unit of PNI.However,when it exceeded 41.35,even if the PNI increased again,the mortality rate could not be further reduced.The cumulative overall survival rate of the PNI median group was significantly higher than that of the PNI low value group(P=0.028).Within a certain range(PNI=26~41),PNI),PNI was an independent protective factor for the risk of death.Conclusions:PNI values have a certain predictive value for prognosis in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer after radical resection.Within a certain range(PNI=26~41),PNI is an independent protective factor for death risk after radical resection of advanced colorectal cancer.
作者 周红杞 王文玲 张汝一 董洪敏 王刚 陈唯唯 李国栋 ZHOU Hongqi;WANG Wenling;ZHANG Ruyi;DONG Hongmin;WANG Gang;CHEN Weiwei;LI Guodong(Department of Oncology,Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China;Department of Anorectal Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China)
出处 《贵州医科大学学报》 CAS 2019年第3期335-340,共6页 Journal of Guizhou Medical University
基金 贵州省教育厅创新群体重大研究项目[黔教合KY字(2018)020]
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 进展期 预后营养指数 预后 回归分析 colorectal neoplasms,advanced stage prognostic nutritional index prognosis regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1曹伟新.恶性肿瘤患者的营养不良风险和干预[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(5):499-502. 被引量:21
  • 2Schiesser M, Mtiller S, Kirchhoff P, et al. Assessment of a novel screening score for nutritional risk in predicting complications in gastro-intestinal surgery. Clin Nutr, 2008,27(4) : 565-570.
  • 3Velasco C, Garcia E, Rodrfguez V, et al. Comparison of four nutritional screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients: a multicentre study. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2011,65 (2): 269-274.
  • 4Garth AK, Newsome CM, Simmance N, et al. Nutritional status, nutrition practices and post-operative complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. J Hum Nutr Diet, 2010,23 (4) :393- 401.
  • 5Leandro-Merhi VA, de Aquino JL, Sales Chagas JF. Nutrition status and risk factors associated with length of hospital stay for surgical patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2011,35 (2) : 241-248.
  • 6Bozzetti F, SCRINIO Working Group. Screening the nutritional status in oncology: a preliminary report on 1,000 outpatients. Support Care Cancer, 2009,17 (3) : 279-284.
  • 7Ling CH, de Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, et al. Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr, 2011,30 (5) : 610-615.
  • 8Olivier B, Claire DB, Phasaro H, et al. Fat mass protects hospitalized elderly persons against morbidity and mortality. Am J Clin Nutr, 2009,90 (3) : 505-510.
  • 9Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreamaent serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J, 2010,9 : 69.
  • 10Drescher T, Singler K, Ulrich A, et al. Comparison of two malnutrition risk screening methods (MNA and NRS 2002) and their association with markers of protein malnutrition in geriatric hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2010,64 (8) :887-893.

共引文献90

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部