期刊文献+

骏马易见,伯乐难寻:决策者心智模式影响创意识别的机制及边界条件 被引量:13

Pearls are everywhere but not the eyes: The mechanism and boundary conditions of the influences of decision maker's mental models on idea recognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前组织创造力和创新研究与实践的一大误区,是重视员工的创意生成而忽视决策者的创意识别。决策者对组织创新的影响更大,探讨决策者创意识别的影响因素及其作用机制,是本领域研究的新方向。决策者的心智模式——即个体用以描述、解释和预测事物并指导判断和决策的知识及信念结构,是影响创意识别准确性的关键因素。然而,其重要性尚未得到充分认识。本项目以创造力的系统观作为理论框架,综合采用实验和现场研究方法,通过4个子研究揭示固着型与成长型两类决策者的心智模式影响创意识别的中介机制,并探讨决策者、创造者和环境三个子系统影响决策者创意识别的协同作用。本项目从决策者角度探讨其创意识别的过程及结果,在理论上为组织创造力和创新研究引入了新视角和新议题,并有望为决策者如何规避创新决策的陷阱提供实践指导。 As one of the major limitations in organizational creativity and innovation research, much endeavor has been focused on idea generation rather than on idea recognition. Recognizing creative ideas among many options is the most crucial stage in the long process of organizational innovation, and contributes more to its success than generating ideas does. The critical role of decision maker's mental model-the knowledge and belief structure that individuals use to describe, interpret, predict outside world, and to make judgment and decisions-on idea recognition has yet been examined. By adopting Csikszentmihalyi's (1988, 1999) system view of creativity, the current study aims a) to demonstrate the difference in idea recognition accuracy between decision makers holding a fixed mindset or a growth mindset;b) to reveal the mediating effect of decision makers' uncertainty tolerance decision makers;and c) to investigate the moderating effects of idea features and the pattern of organizational innovation practice. The current study contributes to organizational creativity and innovation literature by introducing a new perspective to this field. Also, decision makers can gain insight on how to avoid costly mistakes by reflecting on and modifying mental models of their own.
作者 白新文 齐舒婷 明晓东 周意勇 黄明权 BAI Xinwen;QI Shuting;MING Xiaodong;ZHOU Yiyong;HUANG Mingquan(CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期571-586,共16页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71871214) 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0802600)
关键词 组织创造力与创新 决策者 创意识别 心智模式 固着型/成长型心智模式 organizational creativity & innovation decision makers idea recognition mental models fixed/growth mindsets
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献88

  • 1王登峰,崔红.对中国人人格结构的探索——中国人个性量表与中国人人格量表的交互验证[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,31(5):5-16. 被引量:19
  • 2刘雪峰,张志学,梁钧平.认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):611-618. 被引量:66
  • 3Levinthal DA,March JG.The myopia of learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:95 ~ 112.
  • 4Ghemawat P,Ricart i Costa JE.The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency[J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:59 ~ 73.
  • 5Floyd,S.,Lane,P.Strategizing throughout the organization:Managing role conflict in strategic renewal[J].Academy of Management Review,2000,25:154 ~ 177.
  • 6McGrath RG.Exploratory learning,innovative capacity,and managerial oversight[J].Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(1):118~131.
  • 7Benner M J,Tushman ML.Process management and technological innovation:a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2002,47 (4):676 ~ 706.
  • 8Benner MJ,Tushman ML.Exploitation,exploration,and process management:the productivity dilemma revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):238 ~ 256.
  • 9Gupta AK,Smith KG,Shalley CE.The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49 (4):693 ~ 706.
  • 10He ZL,Wong PK.Exploration vs.exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization Science,2004,15(4):481 ~494.

共引文献81

同被引文献130

引证文献13

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部