摘要
目的研究分析冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(CHD)患者行心血管介入治疗的临床效果及安全性。方法选取2016年12月至2017年12月福建省晋江市中医院收治114例CHD患者作为本次的研究对象,采用随机数字表法将114例患者分为研究组与参照组2组,2组患者例数均为57例。参照组采用常规对症治疗,研究组则在采用心血管介入疗法进行治疗。观察比较2组患者的临床治疗效果,并统计分析2组患者的住院时间以及治疗的并发症情况。结果研究组治疗总有效率为96.49%,参照组治疗的总有效率为78.95%,研究组治疗的临床效果高于参照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组和参照组的平均住院时间分别为(6.3±1.1)d、(9.8±1.7)d,研究组的住院时间短于参照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组治疗期间的并发症发生率为5.26%(3/57),参照组治疗期间的并发症发生率为21.05%(12/50),研究组治疗的并发症发生率低于参照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CHD患者采用心血管介入疗法进行治疗,具有良好的临床效果,患者的住院时间短,并发症少,安全性良好,值得临床进一步推广应用。
Objective To study the clinical effect and safety of cardiovascular interventional therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods 114 patients with coronary heart disease from December 2016 to December 2017 were selected as the objects of study. 114 patients were divided into two groups: study group and reference group by random number table method. The number of patients in both groups was 57 cases. The reference group was treated with conventional symptomatic treatment and the study group was treated with cardiovascular intervention. The clinical effects of the two groups were observed and compared, and the hospitalization time and complications of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results The total effective rate was 96.49% in the study group and 78.95% in the reference group. The clinical effect of the study group was higher than that of the reference group(P<0.05). The average hospital stay in the study group and the reference group were(6.3±1.1) days and(9.8±1.7) days, respectively. The hospitalization time of the study group was shorter than that of the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The complication rate during the treatment group was 5.26%(3/57), and the complication rate during the reference group was 21.05%(12/50). The complication rate of the study group was lower than that of the reference group statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The patients with coronary heart disease treated by cardiovascular interventional therapy have good clinical effect, the hospitalization time is short, the complication is less, and the safety is good, which is worthy of further clinical application.
作者
张玉梅
李劲松
张登庆
Zhang Yumei;Li Jingsong;Zhang Dengqing(Department of Cardiology, Jinjiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jinjiang 362200, Fujian, China)
出处
《血管与腔内血管外科杂志》
2018年第5期413-417,共5页
Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
