期刊文献+

护生压力量表与护生压力指数量表中文版的一致性研究 被引量:4

The consistency study of Chinese version of stressors in nursing students and the student nurse stress index scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨护生压力量表中文版(the Chinese version of stressors in nursing students,SINS-CHI)与护生压力指数量表中文版(the Chinese version of student nurse stress index scale,SNSI-CHI)在评估本科护理专业学生压力中的一致性。方法随机抽取河南省三所院校的护理本科生960例,对其进行SINS-CHI与SNSI-CHI问卷调查,运用SPSS 21.0进行信度和效度分析。结果 SINS-CHI的得分为(112.73±26.07)分,Cronbach's α为0.926,Guttman分半信度系数为0.893,重测信度为0.820;内容效度指数(content validity index,CVI)为0.890;灵敏度为70.0%,特异度为62.3%,约登指数为0.323,ROC曲线下面积为0.710。SNSI-CHI的得分为(58.71±14.18)分,Cronbach's α为0.893,Guttman分半信度系数为0.829,重测信度0.966;CVI为0.954;灵敏度为71.4%,特异度为63.6%,约登指数为0.350,ROC曲线下面积为0.714。结论 SINS-CHI与SNSI-CHI量表的一致性较好。 Objective To explore the consistency between the Chinese Version of Stressors in Nursing Students (SINS-CHI) and the Student Nurse Stress Index Scale (SNSI-CHI) in assessing the pressure of undergraduate nursing students. Methods A total of 960 nursing undergraduates from three universities in Henan province were randomly selected.SINS-CHI and SNSI-CHI were applied to all subjects and SPSS 21.0 was used to analyze the validity and reliability. Results The total score of SINS-CHI was (112.73±26.07). The Cronbach's α was 0.926, the Guttman's partial reliability coefficient was 0.893, the test-retest reliability was 0.820, the content validity index (CVI) was 0.890, the sensitivity was 70.0%, and the specificity was 62.3%.The Yoden index was 0.323 and the area under the ROC curve was 0.710.The total score of SNSI-CHI was (58.71±14.18). The Cronbach's α was 0.893, Guttman split-half reliability coefficient was 0.829, test-retest reliability was 0.966, CVI was 0.954, sensitivity was 71.4%, specificity was 63.6%.The Yoden index was 0.350 and the area under the ROC curve was 0.714. Conclusion The consistency of SINS-CHI and SNSI-CHI is good.
作者 郭玉茹 刘延锦 郭丽娜 余溯源 朱义如 Guo Yuru;Liu Yanjin;Guo Lina;Yu Suyuan;Zhu Yiru(Orthopaedics Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;Nursing Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;Neurology Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期172-176,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71673254).
关键词 量表 压力 本科护生 一致性 Scale Pressure Undergraduate nursing student Consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1陆建华 汝信 陆学艺 李培林 主编.社会发展进程步入全新的开放阶段[A].汝信,陆学艺,李培林,主编.2002年中国社会形势分析与预测[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.15—16.
  • 2Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 3Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 4Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 5Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 6Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 7Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 8Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 9Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 10Napholz L. Stress-reduction psychoeducational intervention for black working women. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 2002,37 :263-272.

共引文献1835

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部