期刊文献+

基于超效率DEA-FKM的城市机动车信号交叉口安全评价研究

Research on safety evaluation of urban motor vehicle signalized intersection based on super-efficiency DEA-FKM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过相关性分析,建立了在不同条件下的交叉口安全评价指标体系。基于数据包络原理,在C^2R模型的基础上,建立超效率DEA模型,结合改进的初始簇中心的K均值聚类法(FKM),构建交叉口评价方法。以西宁市城中区10个交叉口为例进行评价,得到各交叉口安全指数和安全等级。结果表明,该方法可对城市交叉口安全性进行有效评价,采用超效率DEA指数聚类,结果避免了偏聚类现象,该研究丰富了现有交叉口安全评价方法。 Using correlation analysis, a flexible evaluation index system for intersection safety under different conditions was established. Based on the data envelopment theory and the model of C 2 R , a super-efficiency DEA model was established, and by combining the improved K means clustering algorithm (FKM) which had the initial cluster center, an intersection evaluation method was constructed. Taking the 10 intersections in the central district of Xining City as an example for evaluation, the safety indexes and safety grades of each intersection were obtained. The results showed that this method could effectively evaluate the safety of urban intersections;By using super-efficient DEA index clustering, the bias clustering phenomenon was avoided and the existing intersection safety evaluation methods were enriched.
作者 于成功 李秀邦 马生元 YU Cheng-gong;LI Xiu-bang;MA Sheng-yuan(School of Automobile, Chang′an University, Xi′an 710064,China;School of traffic,Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining 810007,China)
出处 《山东科学》 CAS 2019年第2期108-114,共7页 Shandong Science
基金 青海省重大科技专项(2015-SF-A5)
关键词 城市交通 安全评价 交通冲突 超效率DEA 改进FKM city traffic safety evaluation traffic conflict super-efficiency DEA improved FKM
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘涛,李晔.区域道路交通安全水平综合评价和预测方法[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(3):311-315. 被引量:16
  • 2罗江涛,刘小明,任福田.道路交通安全灰色评价方法研究[J].中国公路学报,1995,8(4):78-83. 被引量:38
  • 3钱大琳,黄迪.信号平交路口右转机动车穿越直行自行车决策行为研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(5):140-144. 被引量:8
  • 4公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报:2012年[R].北京:公安部交通管理局,2013.
  • 5Zhou Zhuping, Liu Yingshun, Wang Wei, et al. Multi- nomial logit model of pedestrian crossing behaviors at signalized intersections [ J ]. Discrete Dynamics in Na- ture and Society, 2013, 2013 : 172726-1 - 172726-8.
  • 6Lord D. Analysis of pedestrian conflicts with left-turn- ing traffic [ J]. Transportation Research Record, 1996, 1538 : 61 - 67.
  • 7Alhajyaseen W K M, Asano M, Nakamura H. Estima- tion of left-turning vehicle maneuvers for the assessment of pedestrian safety at intersections [ J ]. IATSS Re- search, 2012, 36(1): 66-74.
  • 8Wang X, Abdel-Aty M. Analysis of left-turn crash inju- ry severity by conflicting pattern using partial propor-tional odds models [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Preven- tion, 2008, 40(5) : 1674 - 1682.
  • 9Ismail K, Sayed T, Saunier N, et al. Automated analy- sis of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using video data [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 2009, 2140:44 -54.
  • 10Alhajyaseen W K M, Asano M, Nakamura H, et al. Gap acceptance models for left-turning vehicles facing pedestrians at signalized crosswalks[ C/OL]//3rd Inter- national Conference on Road Safety and Simulation. In- dianapolis, USA, 2011. http ://onlinepubs. trb. org/on- linepubs/conferences/2011/RSS/3/Alhajyaseen, W. pdf.

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部