期刊文献+

柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片联合羟氯喹片和甲氨蝶呤片治疗类风湿关节炎的临床研究 被引量:25

Clinical trial of sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets combined with hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablets and methotrexate tablets in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片联合羟氯喹片和甲氨蝶呤片治疗类风湿关节炎的临床疗效及安全性。方法将74例类风湿关节炎患者随机分为对照组和试验组,每组37例。对照组予以甲氨蝶呤每次15 mg,每周1次,口服;试验组在对照组治疗的基础上,予以羟氯喹片每次0. 2 g,bid,口服+柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片第1周每次0. 25 g,第2周每次0. 50 g,第3周每次0. 75 g,第4周开始每次1. 00 g,bid,口服。2组患者均治疗24周。比较2组患者的临床疗效,血清C反应蛋白(CRP)、类风湿因子(RF)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)的水平,以及药物不良反应的发生情况。结果治疗后,试验组和对照组的总有效率分别为91. 89%(34例/37例)和72. 97%(27例/37例),差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。治疗后,试验组和对照组的CRP分别为(6. 37±2. 51)和(9. 27±3. 25) mg·L-1,RF分别为(68. 54±21. 35)和(102. 37±24. 58) U·L-1,ESR分别为(35. 26±14. 52)和(53. 19±15. 56) mm·h-1,差异均有统计学意义(均P <0. 05)。试验组和对照组的药物不良反应主要有胃肠道不适(18. 92%vs13. 51%)、发热(5. 41%vs 10. 81%)和皮疹(13. 51%vs 10. 81%),差异均无统计学意义(均P> 0. 05)。结论柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片联合羟氯喹片和甲氨蝶呤片治疗类风湿关节炎的临床疗效确切,其能有效地降低血清CRP和RF含量及ESR,且不增加药物不良反应的发生率。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets combined with hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablets and methotrexate tablets in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Methods A total of 74 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomly divided into treatment and control groups with 37 cases per group.Control group received methotrexate 15 mg per time,once a week,orally.Treatment group received hydroxychloroquine sulfate 0.2 g per time,bid,orally + sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets 0.25 g per time at the first week,0.50 g per time at the second week,0.75 g per time at the third week and 1.00 g per time at the fourth week,bid,orally,on the basis of the control group.Two groups were treated for 24 weeks.The clinical efficacy,serum C reactive protein( CRP),rheumatoid factor( RF),erythrocyte sedimentation rate( ESR),and adverse drug reactions were compared between two groups.Results After treatment, the total effective rates of treatment and control groups were 91.89%( 34 cases/37 cases) and 72.97%( 27 cases/37 cases)with significant difference( P < 0.05).After treatment,the main indexes of treatment and control groups were compared: CRP were( 6.37±2.51) and( 9.27±3.25) mg·L-1,RF were( 68.54±21.35) and( 102.37±24.58)U·L-1,ESR were( 35.26±14.52) and( 53.19±15.56) mm·h-1,the differences were statistically significant( all P < 0.05).The adverse drug reactions of treatment and control groups were gastrointestinal discomfort( 18.92%vs 13.51%),fever( 5.41% vs 10.81%) and rash( 13.51% vs 10.81%),the differences were not statistically significant( all P > 0.05).Conclusion Sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets combined with hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablets and methotrexate tablets have a definitive clinical efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis,which can effectively reduce serum CRP and RF levels and ESR,without increasing the incidence of adverse drug reactions.
作者 李国铨 叶凤 郭峰 王善志 韩锋 沈瑞明 王敏 郑颜萍 梁海琴 庄乙君 LI Guo-quan;YE Feng;GUO Feng;WANG Shan-zhi;HAN Feng;SHEN Rui-ming;WANG Min;ZHENG Yan-ping;LIANG Hai-qin;ZHUANG Yi-jun(Department of Nephrotic and Rheumatism Haikou 570102, China;Department of Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China;Department of Nephrology, Hainan General Hospital Agriculture and Reclamalutn, Haikou 570311, China)
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期507-509,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 海南省自然科学基金资助项目(814342)
关键词 柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片 羟氯喹片 甲氨蝶呤片 类风湿关节炎 安全性评价 sulfasalazine enteric - coated tablet hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablet methotrexate tablet rheumatoid arthritis safety evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献64

  • 1Tao Wang,Chang-Liang Zhu,Shuai Wang,Li-Wen Mo,Guo-Dong Yang,Jun Hu,Fan Zhang.Role of NLRP3 and NLRP1 inflammasomes signaling pathways in pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis[J].Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine,2014,7(10):827-831. 被引量:12
  • 2St Clair EW, Pisetsky DS, Haynes BF.类风湿关节炎.王吉波,吕振华,译.北京:人民卫生出版,2008:13-16.
  • 3Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62(9): 2569-2581.
  • 4Sandan M, Sandan P, Perneger T, et al. Celecoxib versus ibuprofen in the prevention of heterotopic ossification following total hip replacement: a prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(2): 155-159.
  • 5van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Rodriguez-Valverde V, et al. Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiograhpic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum, 2006, 54(4): 1063-1074.
  • 6van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Landewe R, et al. Disease remission and sustained halting of radiographic progression with combination etanercept and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 2007, 56(12): 3928-3939.
  • 7Horiuchi T, Mitoma H, Harashima S, et al. Transmembrane TNF- alpha: structure, function and interaction with anti-TNF agents. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2010, 49(7): 1215-1228.
  • 8Maksymowyeh WP. Update on the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2007, 3(6): 1125-1133.
  • 9Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, et al. 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis, 2011, 70(6): 896-904.
  • 10Dougaclos M, Braun J, Szanto S, et al. Efficacy of etanercept on rheumatic signs and pulmonary function tests in advanced ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomised double-blind placebo- controlled study (SPINE). Ann Rheum Dis, 2011, 70(5): 799-804.

共引文献128

同被引文献256

引证文献25

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部