摘要
零容忍一词已近滥觞,但对其内涵的理解不尽一致。不应仅从字面意义或数学意义上简单解读零容忍的内涵,社会学意义的解读更为可取。零容忍应分为立法上的零容忍和司法上的零容忍,立法零容忍是一种绝对的"无"的零容忍,司法零容忍则是一种有限度的、且是最低限度的容忍,此种最低限度容忍的具体程度面对不同语境、时空、对象时均有差异。我国施行零容忍政策有破窗理论和积极刑法立法观的理论支持,且其思想内涵在我国颇有渊源。对比域外"立法定性"的刑事立法模式,我国"定性+定量"的立法模式不利于实施零容忍政策。零容忍政策的实现应采取立法定性和"严而不厉"的立法模式,在司法上贯彻最低限度的容忍,力图破除法官滥用自由裁量权、过度刑法化和国家刑罚权的恣意扩张的担忧。
The term“zero tolerance”has been used frequently,but the understanding of its meaning is not consistent.The meaning of zero tolerance should not be simply interpreted in the literal or mathematical sense,and the interpretation of sociological meaning is preferable.Zero tolerance should be divided into zero tolerance in legislation and zero tolerance in justice.Zero tolerance in legislation is an absolute“nothing”or“zero”.But the zero tolerance of justice is a limited and minimal tolerance.The specific degree of such minimum tolerance is different when faced with different contexts,space-time and objects.The implementation of the zero tolerance policy in China has the theoretical support of the Broken-window theory and the positive criminal law legislation.In addition,ancient China also has similar ideological connotations.Compared with the criminal legislative model of“legislative qualitative”outside the domain,the legislative model of“qualitative+quantitative”is not conducive to the implementation of zero tolerance policy in China.The implementation of the zero tolerance policy should adopt a legislative model of qualitative and tight but not harsh.The implementation of minimum tolerance in justice should break the fear of the judge’s abuse of discretion,excessive criminalization and the arbitrary expansion of the state’s penal power.
作者
卢建平
司冰岩
LU Jian-ping;SI Bing-yan(School of Law in Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;College for Criminal Law Science of Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《北京联合大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2019年第2期72-83,共12页
Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
零容忍
破窗理论
积极的刑法立法观
立法定性
司法定量
zero tolerance
broken window theory
positive criminal law legislation
legislative qualitative
judicial quantitative
