期刊文献+

右美托咪定对达芬奇机器人辅助胸外科手术患者术后恢复质量和智能精神状态的影响 被引量:7

Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative recovery and mental state in patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价右美托咪定对行达芬奇机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)患者术后恢复质量和智能精神状态的影响。方法择期在全身麻醉下行RATS的患者60例,性别不限,年龄20~70岁,BMI<30 kg/m^2,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为对照组和研究组,每组30例。2组患者麻醉诱导和维持方法相同:依次静脉注射咪达唑仑0.04 mg/kg、舒芬太尼0.4μg/kg、丙泊酚1.5~2.0 mg/kg和罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg进行麻醉诱导,气管插管后行机械通气;麻醉维持采用吸入体积分数为0.015~0.025的七氟烷,使最低肺泡有效浓度(MAC)维持在0.5,每隔30 min静脉注射罗库溴铵5 mg,靶控输注(TCI)丙泊酚1.0~1.5μg/mL,输注瑞芬太尼0.05~0.15μg/(kg·min),维持脑电双频指数(BIS)值40~60。研究组在气管插管后10 min内静脉输注右美托咪定1μg/kg,随后泵注右美托咪定0.4μg/(kg·h)至手术结束前30 min,对照组给予等容量0.9%氯化钠溶液。分别在患者入手术室吸氧后(T_0),单肺通气后10 min(T_1)、20 min(T_2)、30 min(T_3)、40 min(T_4),以及双肺通气后15 min(T_5)各时间点,记录患者的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率、脑血氧饱和度。记录术中失血量、尿量、手术时间、麻醉时间、丙泊酚总用量,以及使用麻黄素和阿托品的患者例数。于拔除气管导管后吸空气状态下记录呼吸频率,以及行动脉血气分析记录动脉血氧分压(p_aO_2)和二氧化碳分压(p_aCO_2)。记录拔除胸部引流管时间、住院天数和肺部并发症(肺不张、肺炎、肺持续漏气)的发生情况。分别于术前和术后第1、3天完成恢复质量量表(QoR-15量表)和简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE量表)的评定。结果两组患者间各时间点的MAP、心率、脑血氧饱和度的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。两组患者间手术时间、麻醉时间、术中失血量和尿量、血管活性药物使用情况的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05),研究组的丙泊酚总用量显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。拔除气管导管后吸空气状态下,研究组的呼吸频率显著低于对照组(P<0.05),p_aO_2显著高于对照组(P<0.05),但两组间p_aCO_2的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后48 h内,研究组患者自控静脉镇痛平均按压次数显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者间肺部并发症发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组拔除胸部引流管时间和住院天数均显著短于对照组(P值均<0.05)。两组患者间术前QoR-15量表和MMSE量表得分的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);术后第1天,研究组的QoR-15量表和MMSE量表得分均显著高于对照组(P值均<0.05);术后第3天,研究组的MMSE量表得分显著高于对照组(P<0.05),两组间QoR-15量表得分的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 RATS术中使用右美托咪定可减少术中全身麻醉药用量,缩短患者住院天数,改善患者的术后恢复质量和智能精神状态。 Objective To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative recovery and mental state in patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracic surgery(RATS). Methods Sixty patients, American Society of the Anesthesiologists(ASA) grading Ⅰ or Ⅱ, aged 20-70 years, body mass index(BMI)<30 kg/m2, scheduled for RATS under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each): control group and dexmedetomidine group. Anesthesia was induced with 0.04 mg/kg midazolam, 0.4 μg/kg sulfentanyl, 1.5-2.0 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium in all the patients. Then tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were performed. The anesthesia was maintained with 0.015-0.025 sevoflurane inhalation by keeping the minimum alveolar concentration(MAC) at 0.5, continuous target controlled infusion(TCI) of propofol at 1-1.5 μg/mL and remifentanil at 0.05-0.15 μg/(kg·min), and injection of 5 mg rocuronium at 30 min intervals. Bispectral index(BIS) was maintained at 40-60. In dexmedetomidine group, 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine was infused intravenously in 10 min after intubation followed by continuous infusion at 0.4 μg/(kg·h) until 30 min before the end of operation. Control group received the equal volume of normal saline. Mean arterial pressure(MAP), heart rate(HR) and cerebral oxygen saturation were recorded after oxygen uptaking in operation room(T0), 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 40 min after one-lung ventilation(T1, T2, T3, T4) and 15 min after two-lung ventilation(T5). Blood loss, urine volume, operation time, anesthesia time, consumption of propofol, use of ephedrine and atropine, respiratory rate and arterial blood gas analysis at room air after extubation, time to chest tube removal, length of hospital stay and postoperative complication(atelectasis, pheumonia and prolonged air leakage) were observed and recorded. QoR-15 and MMSE were scored on preoperative day, postoperative day 1 and 3. Results There was no significant difference in MAP, HR or cerebral oxygen saturation between groups at any time points(all P>0.05). Neither was the operation time, anesthesia time, blood loss, urine volume or use of vasoactive agents(all P>0.05). Consumption of propofol in dexmedetomidine group was statistically lower than that in control group(P<0.05). Compared with control group, after extubation, respiratory rate was significantly decreased, while partial pressure of oxygen(paO2) was significantly increased in dexmedetomidine group(both P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide(paCO2) between groups(P>0.05). Within 48 hours after surgery, the average press times of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group than that in control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups(P>0.05). Time to chest tube removal and length of hospital day were significantly shorter in dexmedetomidine group than those in control group(all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the scores of QoR-15 and MMSE on preoperative day(both P>0.05). The QoR-15 score on postoperative day 1 and MMSE score on postoperative day 1 and 3 were significantly higher in dexmedetomidine group than those in control group(all P<0.05). Conclusion Intraoperative application of dexmedetomidine can shorten hospital stay, improve postoperative recovery and mental state in patients undergoing RATS.
作者 张丽芸 张昱昊 沈杰 罗艳 ZHANG Liyun;ZHANG Yuhao;SHEN Jie;LUO Yan(Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China)
出处 《上海医学》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第2期97-101,共5页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 右美托咪定 胸外科手术 机器人手术 恢复质量 术后智能精神状态 Dexmedetomidine Thoracic surgical procedures Robotic surgery Quality of recovery Postoperative mental state
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1Chrysostomou C, Schmitt C G. Dexmedetomidine: sedation, analgesia and beyond [J].Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxieol, 2008, 4 (5) : 619 - 627.
  • 2Maria C, Laveniya $, Nicole B, et al. Modulation of immune response by head injury [J]. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured,2007, 38: 1392- 1400.
  • 3Horn M, Seger F, Schlote W. Neuron - specific enolase in gerbil brain and serum after transient cerebral ischemia [J ]. Stroke, 1995,26 : 290 - 297.
  • 4Feeney D M, Boyeson M G, Linn R T, et al. Responses to cortical injury-I :methodology and local effects of contusions in the rat [J]. Brain Research, 1981, 211 ( 1 ) : 67 - 77.
  • 5Knoblach S M, Fan L, Faden A. I. Early neuronal expression of tumor necrosis factor - a after.experimental brain injury contributes to neurological impairment[J]. Journal of Neuroimmunology, 1999,95:115- 125,.
  • 6Zaremba J, Losy J. Cytokines in clinical and experimental isehemic stroke[J]. Neurol Neuroehir Pol, 2004,38 : 57 - 62.
  • 7Intiso D, Zarrelli M M, Lagioia G, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha serum levels and inflammatory response in acute ischemic stroke patients[J ]. Neurol Sci, 2004,24: 390 - 396.
  • 8Bermpohl D, You Z, Lo, E H, et al. TNF alpha and Fas mediate tissue damage and functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice[J]. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab, 2007,27,1669- 1680.
  • 9Srirarn K, O'Callaghan J P. Divergent roles for tumor necrosis factor -alpha in the brain[J]. Neuroimmune Pharmaeol, 2007, 2:140- 153.
  • 10Rhodes J K, Andrews P J, Holmes M C,et al. Expression of interleukin - 6 messenger RNA in a rat model of diffuse axonal injury[J]. Neurosei Lettm, 2002,335(1 ) ; l - 4.

共引文献144

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部