摘要
尽管《艺舟双楫》的成书时间较之阮元著作后出六载,然包世臣碑学思想的授受与酝酿,却是长期贯注在他自少时起便孜孜不倦的创作实践中,同时深深获益于其交游问学之诸师友的切磋相长。包世臣一生所形成的社会关系网皆与桐城派的渊系甚深,从而将文坛中与之对立的骈文派旗手阮元排斥在外。其碑学思想遂与其文学思想相观照,在桐城派古文大家之文论文法的沾溉下,融入书论,从而彰示出"文书观照,互为阐发"的综合形态,且一以贯之着对笔法、运锋、结体、分势等可操作性极强、示范意义极大的具体创作技巧的形而下实践品格。因此,包世臣与阮元不存在踵继、阐扬的谱系传承线索,二人有着各自不同的渊源授受。二人碑学理论应呈"一水中分,二流并进"的峥嵘态势,并在各自的社会关系网络以及传承后学的发展中互衍共生。
Although Yizhou-Shuangji was six years later than yuen's book, the acceptance and preparation of its epistology was rooted in his long practice. And it also deeply benefited from the teachings of his teachers and friends.The social network of Bao Shichen’s life was closely related to Tongcheng School, soRuan Yuan would be excluded from literature.His epistology and literary thought are viewed with each other, Under the influence of the ancient prose theory of Tongcheng School, His theory of calligraphy presents a comprehensive formand focuses on the problem of operational skills.Therefore, Bao Shichen and Ruan Yuan do not have a kind of inheritance and promotion, the two have different backgrounds. It should be said that the two men's inscriptions are like two streams of a river.
出处
《南京艺术学院学报（美术与设计）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期77-81,I0003,共6页
Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design
基金
2019年江苏省科研与实践创新计划项目"清代文学与艺术的理论互构范式研究"
关键词
包世臣
《艺舟双楫》
阮元
碑学思想
桐城派
Bao Shichen
Yizhou-Shuangji
Ruan Yuan
Stone inscription rubbings thought
Tongcheng School
