摘要
目的对比分析自动弹力线痔疮套扎术(RPH)与外剥内扎术联合治疗及吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)单独治疗重度混合痔的临床疗效。方法选取2017年5月—2018年5月我院收治的100例重度混合痔患者,将其随机分为研究组(50例)与对照组(50例)。对照组患者采取PPH治疗,研究组患者采取RPH联合外剥内扎术治疗,对比两组患者治疗效果、手术相关指标,并观察术后肛门功能评分差异。结果研究组患者的临床疗效高于对照组(P<0.05);手术时间及术中出血量、住院时间两组患者比较,研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后干便、气体、稀便、生活方式发生变化、需衬垫等肛门功能评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 RPH与外剥内扎术联合治疗重度混合痔效果优于单独应用PPH治疗,值得临床推广。
Objective To study the efficacy and its influence on anal function of RPH combined with external ligation and internal ligation in the treatment of severe mixed hemorrhoids. Methods 100 patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were selected as research subjects. They were randomly divided into the study group and the control group,50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with PPH,and the study group was treated with RPH combined with external stripping and internal ligation. The therapeutic effect and operation related indexes of the two groups were compared,and the postoperative anal function scores were observed. Results The clinical efficacy of the study group was higher than that of the control group ( P <0.05),and the intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time and hospitalization time of the study group were lower than that of the control group ( P <0.05). The anal function scores such as dry stool,gas,dilution,lifestyle changes and padding requirement in the study group were lower than those in the control group ( P <0.05). Conclusion RPH combined with external stripping and internal ligation is better than PPH alone in the treatment of severe mixed hemorrhoids.
作者
徐一劲
XU Yijin(Dongguan People s Hospital,Dongguan 523000,China)
出处
《广州医药》
2019年第3期45-47,121,共4页
Guangzhou Medical Journal
基金
东莞市级课题(201650715001399)
关键词
重度混合痔
自动弹力线痔疮套扎术
外剥内扎术
吻合器痔上黏膜环切术
Severe mixed hemorrhoids
Automatic elastic string hemorrhoids ligation
External stripping and internal ligation
Stapler hemorrhoidectomy
