摘要
基于大学智库专家学术与政治双重角色特征的视角,阐释了大学智库专家在学术与政治间的角色碰撞与冲突。学术与政治存在交互及对立:当智库专家在学术与政治交互无界限时,其角色形象受损;当学术与政治"互斥"时,政治角色充盈,学术角色束之高阁。毕竟,学术是大学智库专家的立身之本,大学智库专家扮演政治智库角色时应该有警戒线。为此,大学智库专家在学术与政治角色之间应坚守价值中立原则,适当交融,保持距离,把握尺度,避免角色混乱和冲突。
Based on the perspective of the academic and political roles of university think tank experts,the article explains the collision and conflict of university think tank experts in their academic roles and political ones.Academic and political roles are interactive and inverse.When the think tank experts are involved in the academic and political interaction without limits,the role images will be damaged.When the academic and political roles are“mutually exclusive”,the political role is fulfilled while the academic role is shelved.After all,the academic role is the foundation of university think tank experts.It is suggested that the university think tank experts,playing a political think tank role,should have a warning line.To this end,the university think tank experts between the academic and political roles should adhere to the principle of value neutrality,appropriate blending,keeping distance,keeping the balance,so as to avoid confusion and conflict of roles.
作者
胡天助
HU Tianzhu(Institute of Higher Education,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100083,China)
出处
《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第3期124-128,共5页
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金2013年度教育学重点课题(AIA130005)
关键词
大学智库专家
学术角色
政治角色
角色冲突
价值中立
university think-tank experts
academic role
political role
role conflict
value-neutrality
