摘要
留置取代“两规”彰显了法治反腐思维,较“两规”而言具有较大的法治进步意义。但是,由于留置措施立法的单一化缺陷,其在理论上与比例原则和人权保障原则有待进一步衔接;同时,监察机关在监察调查实践中也面临权力恣意或者权力萎缩的两难困境。为此,学者提出了留置措施内部控制或强制措施外部借用两种方案,试图化解留置措施面临的理论与实践困境。而基于法治反腐的理论需求与现实考量,监察机关宜在监察解释或实施细则中对留置措施作广义与狭义区分。广义留置具体可包括留置盘问、留置取保、留置监视以及紧急留置,狭义留置则仅指《监察法》第22条规定之情形。
The replacement of “two rules” by liens highlights the thought of anti-corruption by law,which is of greater significance to the progress of rule of law compared with “two rules”.However,due to the unitary defects of legislation of lien measure,it needs to be further connected with the principle of proportionality and the principle of human rights protection in theory.Meanwhile,supervisory agencies also face the dilemma of arbitrary power or shrinking power in the practice of supervision and investigation.Therefore,scholars have proposed two schemes of internal control of lien measures or external borrowing of compulsory measures,trying to resolve the theoretical and practical difficulties faced by lien measures.Based on theoretical needs and practical considerations of combating corruption by rule of law,supervisory agencies should define lien measures in a broad and narrow sense concerning supervisory interpretation or implementation rules.In a broad sense,lien measures include interrogation,bail,surveillance and emergency lien.In a narrow sense,lien measure only refers to the circumstances specified in article 22 in Supervision Law.
作者
马柳颖
黄小龙
MA Liuying;HUANG Xiaolong(School of Economics and Law,Nanhua University,Hengyang,Hunan 421001;School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)
出处
《山东警察学院学报》
2019年第3期78-86,共9页
Journal of Shandong Police College
基金
湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会课题“监察人身调查措施立法缺陷与完善研究”(项目编号:XSP19YBZ002)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
监察留置
立法单一
比例原则
人权保障
消解机制
supervision lien
unitary legislation
principle of proportionality
protection of human rights
solution mechanism
