期刊文献+

静脉窦内接触性溶栓治疗脑出血并脑静脉窦血栓形成的临床疗效及其安全性 被引量:1

Clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous contact thrombolysis for cerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨静脉窦内接触性溶栓治疗脑出血并脑静脉窦血栓形成的临床疗效及其安全性。方法选取江门市新会区第二人民医院2016年5月-2018年3月收治的脑出血并脑静脉窦血栓形成患者25例,随机分为对照组12例和观察组13例。对照组患者给予常规治疗,观察组患者给予静脉窦内接触性溶栓治疗。比较两组患者临床疗效、治疗前后改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,并观察两组患者不良反应发生情况。结果观察组患者总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗前两组患者mRS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗1、2个疗程后观察组患者mRS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论静脉窦内接触性溶栓治疗脑出血并脑静脉窦血栓形成的临床疗效确切,可有效改善血栓情况,且安全性较高。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous contact thrombolysis for cerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.Methods A total of 25 cases of patients with cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis were selected from May 2016 to March 2018 in the Second People’s Hospital of Xinhui District Jiangmen City,which were randomly divided into control group(n=12)and observation group(n=13).The control group was given routine treatment,the observation group was given intravenous contact thrombolysis.The clinical efficacy and the mRS score before and after treatment were compared between the two groups,and the adverse reactions were observed.Results The total effective rate of observation group was higher than control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in the mRS score between the two groups(P>0.05);after 1 or 2 courses of treatment,the observation group of mRS score was lower than control group(P<0.05).The incidence rate of adverse reaction of observation group was lower than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Intravenous contact thrombolysis is clinically effective for cerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,it can effectively improve the thrombosis,and with high safety.
作者 李柏胜 钟朋标 LI Bai-sheng;ZHONG Peng-biao(The Second People's Hospital of Xinhui District Jiangmen City,Jiangmen 529100,China)
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2019年第15期1-2,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 脑出血 脑静脉窦血栓 静脉溶栓 治疗结果 Cerebral hemorrhage Cerebral venous sinus thrombosi Intravenous thrombolysis Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献69

  • 1魏东宁,陈玉萍.中国人脑静脉及静脉窦血栓形成的临床特点[J].中国卒中杂志,2007,2(9):729-733. 被引量:26
  • 2中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南撰写组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2010[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2010,2(4):50-59. 被引量:1847
  • 3中华医学会神经外科分会,中国医师协会神经外科分会,中国医师协会神经内科分会.介入神经放射诊断治疗规范Ⅲ(修订稿)[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2005,2(10):476-480. 被引量:73
  • 4李宝民,李生,曹向宇,王君.出血性脑静脉窦血栓的血管内治疗[J].中华神经外科杂志,2005,21(12):709-712. 被引量:32
  • 5Stam J. Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis; incidence and causes. Adv Neurol, 2003, 92:225-232.
  • 6Agnelli G, Verso M. Epidemiology of cerebral vein and sinus thrombosis. Front Neurol Neurosci, 2008, 23: 16-22.
  • 7Cantu C, Barinagarrementeria F. Cerebral venous thrombosis associated with pregnancy and puerperium. Review of 67 cases. Stroke, 1993, 24(12): 1880-1884.
  • 8Daif A, Awada A, al-Rajeh S, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis in adult. A study of 40 cases from Saudi Arabia.Stroke, 1995, 26(7) : 1193-1195.
  • 9Deschiens MA, Conard J, Horellou MH, et al. Coagulation studies, factor V Leiden, and anticardiolipin antibodies in 40 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke, 1996, 27 (10) : 1724-1730.
  • 10Kellett MW, Martin PJ, Enevoldson TP, et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis associated with 20210 A mutation of the prothrombin gene. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1998, 65 (4) : 611-612.

共引文献32

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部