摘要
背景建立标准化、规范化的家庭医生服务能力评估体系,对加强基层医疗卫生机构的人才培养具有重要意义,而我国目前对家庭医生的培养和评估手段缺乏综合性和系统性。目的探索建立综合、科学、系统性的家庭医生服务能力评估体系。方法在初步构建家庭医生服务能力评估维度的基础上,于2017年10-11月,根据判断抽样原则,邀请15例基层医疗机构的专家,进行2轮Delphi咨询,咨询内容包括家庭医生服务能力评估指标的重要性和完整性评价。根据评价结果,构建家庭医生服务能力评估指标体系。结果咨询专家平均年龄为(51.7±9.9)岁,平均工作年限为(28.4±11.2)年,有效回收率为100.0%,专家权威系数为0.93,专家在一级和二级指标上的意见协调系数分别为0.403(P<0.001)和0.427(P<0.001),建立的家庭医生服务评估指标体系包括临床理论知识与技能评估(包括2个一级指标)、业务能力评估(包括6个一级指标和30个二级指标)及满意度评价(包括5个一级指标)3个维度。结论本研究咨询专家代表性强,积极性和权威性高,初步构建的体系全面反映了社区家庭医生的临床理论、技能、思维能力、业务能力及服务质量,可作为家庭医生服务能力评价的参考依据。
Background The development of a standardized system for the evaluation of the performance of family doctors is of great significance for strengthening the training of primary care providers.However,the evaluation methods for family doctors’ training and performance in China are not comprehensive and systematic.Objective To develop a comprehensive,scientific and systematic family doctor performance evaluation system.Methods We developed the initial version of the Family Doctor Performance Evaluation System(FDPES).Then,we conducted a two-round Delphi consultation in a judgment sample of 15 representatives invited from 15 medical institutions from October 2017 to November 2017 on the issues of the significance and integrity of the indicators in the initial version of the FDPES.According to the Delphi consultation results,we developed the final version of the FDPES after revising the initial version.Results On average,the experts aged(51.7±9.9)years and had(28.4±11.2)years as a healthcare provider.The response rates of the two rounds of consultation were 100.0%.The authority coefficient of the experts was 0.93 and the Kendall’s W for the primary and secondary indicators was 0.403(P<0.001),and 0.427(P<0.001),respectively.The final version of the FDPES consisted of three domains:(1) theoretical knowledge and clinical skills(including two primary indicators);(2) professional capability(including 6 primary indicators and 30 secondary indicators);(3) patient satisfaction(including 5 primary indicators).Conclusion The sampled experts for the Delphi consultation were highly representative,positive and authoritative.And the FDPES can comprehensively evaluate family doctors’ levels of theoretical medical knowledge,clinical skills,clinical thought,professional capability,service quality,which can be used as an aid tool for family doctor performance evaluation.
作者
李觅琼
吴玉苗
朱捷
周春艳
支艳红
祝墡珠
LI Miqiong;WU Yumiao;ZHU Jie;ZHOU Chunyan;ZHI Yanhong;ZHU Shanzhu(Changzheng Community Health Center of Putuo District,Shanghai 200333,China)
出处
《中国全科医学》
CAS
北大核心
2019年第16期1989-1995,共7页
Chinese General Practice
基金
上海市普陀区卫生和计划生育委员会卫生管理类研究课题重点项目(2017PTGL02)
关键词
家庭医生
服务能力
评估
指标体系
DELPHI法
General practitioners
Service ability
Assessment
Indicator system
Delphi method
