期刊文献+

困境与因应:设区的市立法权限范围之“等”字探析 被引量:1

Difficulties and Coping: Analysis of the "Etc" Words in the Scope of City Legislation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自2015年《立法法》修改以来,设区的市获得对城乡建设与管理、环境保护和历史文化保护等三个方面事项制定地方性法规的权限。但是,实践当中原较大的市和新设区的市在三项权力范围之外均存在立法权的行使。三项权力之后限定的“等”字该当如何理解,是“等内等”抑或“等外等”,仍存在较大争议。对立法权限的严格解释已无法满足地方立法的实际需求,亦不能将社会治理和保护公民合法权益完全纳入法治轨道。鉴于设区的市立法权限所负载之功能以及当下地方立法实践之需要,“等”字应做恰当且适度的扩大解释,可理解为“等外等”,即赋予省人大常委会以适度的扩大解释权限。 Since the revision of the "Legislation Law" in 2015, the city of the district has obtained the authority to formulate local regulations on matters such as urban and rural construction and management, environmental protection and historical and cultural protection. However, in practice, the larger cities and newly established districts have legislative powers outside the scope of the three powers. The "etc" word defined after the three powers should be understood as " the same," or " the other," and there is still a big controversy. The strict interpretation of legislative power can no longer meet the actual needs of local legislation, nor can it fully integrate social governance and protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens into the rule of law. In view of the functions of the district's legislative powers and the need for local legislative practice, the word “etc.” should be interpreted as “the other”.That is to say, the standing Committee of the Provincial people's Congress is given appropriate expanded power of interpretation.
作者 李吉映 孟鸿志 LI Ji-ying;MENG Hong-zhi(School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu 211189, China)
机构地区 东南大学法学院
出处 《华北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第4期18-23,共6页 Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 设区的市 较大的市 “等”字 扩大解释 city with district larger city word "etc" expansion explanation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献35

共引文献175

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部