摘要
作为一项公民基本权利,阅读权与国家阅读保障义务并不完全对应,现行全民阅读促进立法仅规定国家阅读保障义务的做法已带来遵守和执行难题,影响到其法律效力的发挥。立法者对法律效力内容的理解偏差是全民阅读促进立法效力难题的根源。文章指出,保障公民阅读权、推进全民阅读,应当正确认识权利的效力内容,充分发挥请求权和救济权对各类阅读保障机构的约束和强制作用。重构全民阅读促进立法的法律效力应以权利为逻辑起点围绕公民阅读权的充分行使来优化立法结构、规定权利内容、细化义务和责任规定。
As a basic right of citizens,the right to read is not completely corresponding to the national reading guarantee obligation.The present legislation promoted by national reading only stipulates the national reading guarantee obligation,which has brought about difficulties in abidance and implementation,and has affected its legal validity.The root of this phenomenon comes from the legislators’misunderstanding of the legal effect.The paper points that,in order to protect citizen’s reading rights and promote national reading,we should have a correct understanding of the legal validity of rights and make full use of the restriction and enforcement function of the right of claim and the right of relief to various reading guarantee institutions.Meanwhile,to reconstruct the legal validity,we should take rights as the logical starting point and focus on the full exercise of citizens’reading rights to optimize the legislative structure,stipulate the content of rights,and refine the obligations and responsibilities.
出处
《图书馆理论与实践》
CSSCI
2019年第6期20-24,共5页
Library Theory and Practice
基金
2018年全国艺术科学规划领导小组委托课题“文化事业、文化产业与旅游业融合发展研究”阶段性研究成果
关键词
全民阅读促进立法
公民阅读权
法律效力
Legislation Promoted by National Reading
Citizen’s Reading Rights
Legal Validity
