摘要
【目的】研究喷头不同组合方式对喷灌均匀度的影响,得到最佳的组合方式。【方法】根据FYRB471 型喷头在不同工作压力下间距1 m采样所得的无风喷洒降水强度,针对喷头分别呈正三角形、正方形、正六边形等组合方式,拟合出了喷头在不同工作压力及组合间距下的降水强度,采用克里斯琴森均匀系数计算了相应的喷灌均匀度。【结果】当工作压力一定时,不同组合方式下的喷灌均匀度都随喷头间距的增大而减小;当喷头间距一定时,组合均匀度与工作压力正相关。当间距小于5.5 m时,不同工作压力下3 种组合方式的均匀度相差不大;当间距大于5.5 m时,随着工作压力或者组合间距的增大,正三角形组合方式所提供的喷灌均匀度最优,正方形组合方式次之,正六边形组合方式最低。正三角形组合方式喷头间距变大时,喷灌均匀度降低;工作压力过大或间距过小时会增加成本,因此农业生产可兼顾考虑效率和成本选择喷头的组合方式以及工作压力,制定合理的喷灌方案。【结论】当组合间距介于5.5 m和8.5 m之间,工作压力介于200 kPa 与320 kPa 时,应考虑采用正三角形组合方式,此时的喷灌均匀度最高,达80%以上;当组合间距小于等于5.5 m时,不同工作压力下的均匀度基本相同,应考虑采用正六边形组合方式,单个喷灌设备覆盖范围最广,成本最低。
【Objective】Irrigation uniformity is an important parameter in irrigation design. The purpose of this paper is to experimentally study the impact of spatial arrangement of sprinklers on irrigation uniformity.【Method】 The FYRB471 sprinkler nozzles were used in the experiment, and the data collected from experiment under different water pressure and spatial arrangements of the sprinklers were used to calculate the Christiansen uniformity coefficient. We compared three spatial arrangements: triangle, square and hexagon. The irrigation-water depth curve under different pressure and arrangements was analyzed to calculate the irrigation uniformity.【Result】 When water pressure remained constant, increasing sprinkler spacing scarified irrigation uniformity, while for a given sprinkler spacing, increasing water pressure benefited irrigation uniformity. There was no difference in irrigation uniformity between the three arrangements when the sprinkler spacing was <5.5 m, whereas when the spacing was >5.5 m, the irrigation of the triangle arrangement was most uniform.【Conclusion】Undesirable water pressure and sprinkler spacing could increase costing and jeopardize irrigation uniformity, and a rationale combination of sprinkler arrangement and water pressure is hence essential in designing sprinkler irrigation. From our experiment, spatially arranging the sprinklers in triangle with space between 5.5 m to 8.5 m and under water pressure between 200 kPa and 320 kPa appeared to be most efficient, increasing irrigation uniformity by more 80%. When the sprinkler spacing was less than 5.5 m, irrigation uniformity was almost same but the hexagon arrangement was preferred because it covered more area, thereby reducing cost compared to other two arrangements.
作者
孙丰刚
谢高畅
彭志颖
姬广淼
周筑南
兰鹏
SUN Fenggang;XIE Gaochang;PENG Zhiying;JI Guangmiao;ZHOU Zhunan;LAN Peng(College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China)
出处
《灌溉排水学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第6期66-72,98,共8页
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
基金
山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2016FB19,ZR2017PF007)
山东省双一流建设基金项目(SYL2017YSTD06)
山东省重点研发计划项目(2017CXGC0206)
泰安市科学技术发展计划(引导计划)(2018NS0081)
关键词
喷灌均匀度
组合方式
工作压力
组合间距
sprinkler uniformity
combination method
work pressure
combination spacing
