摘要
显失公平以意思自治为价值取向,并作为保障意思自治的兜底性条款而存在,故其适用应以主观要件为主、客观要件为辅。危困状态的判定需满足受益方故意利用相对优势对受损方施以轻微胁迫,进而导致其意思表示有瑕疵,此时客观要件的判断应探求受损方的真实意愿,采主观价值说为宜。缺乏判断能力的判定仅需满足受损方缺乏一般判断能力即可,此时受损方行为能力受限,作出的意思表示无意义,故客观要件的判断采客观价值说为宜。
Obviousness and fairness take meaning autonomy as the value orientation, and exist as the basic clause to guarantee the autonomy of meaning. Therefore, its application should be supplemented by subjective elements and objective elements. The determination of the state of distress should meet the intentional use of the relative advantage by the beneficiary to impose a slight coercion on the injured party, which means that the meaning of the victim is flawed. At this time, the judgment of the objective element should seek the true will of the injured party, and it is appropriate to adopt the subjective value. The judgment of lack of judgment ability only needs to satisfy the lack of general judgment ability of the injured party. At this time, the damage ability of the injured party is limited with meaningless intentions. Therefore, the objective value judgment should adopt the objective value.
作者
王少祥
Wang Shaoxiang(Law School,Hainan University, Haikou Hainan 570228,China)
出处
《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第2期51-58,65,共8页
Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
显失公平
意思自治
构成要件
meaning autonomy
obvious unfairness
constituent elements
