期刊文献+

21基因在乳腺癌患者复发风险评估中的临床意义 被引量:5

Clinical significance of 21-gene recurrence evaluation in breast cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺癌21基因复发风险评分(CRS)与临床病理特征的相关性及其在辅助化疗选择中的意义。方法回顾性分析2016年10月~2018年4月我院收治的接受21基因检测的Luminal分型乳腺癌患者162例。采用实时荧光聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测21基因的表达并计算其复发风险评分。据复发风险评分分为低危组(n=51)、中危组(n=80)和高危组(n=31)三组。单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析评估21基因复发风险评分与临床病理特征的相关性及评分等级对辅助化疗选择的影响。结果单因素分析结果显示肿块大小(χ^2=11.528,P=0.001)、Ki67表达水平(χ^2=8.273,P=0.016)、分子分型(χ^2=8.864,P=0.003)、CK5/6表达水平(χ^2=30.915,P<0.001)及组织学分级(χ^2=19.513,P<0.001)均影响乳腺癌患者复发风险。多因素条件logistic回归分析结果显示肿块大小(β=1.175,SD=0.467,Wald=6.322,P=0.012,OR=3.238,95%CI:1.296~8.093)以及组织学分级(β=0.671,SD=0.315,Wald=4.541,P=0.033,OR=1.957,95%CI:1.055~3.629)是21基因复发风险评分危险度分组的影响因素。与低危组比较,中、高危组接受化疗的患者更多(χ^2=46.048,P<0.001)。相较于21基因检测之前,低危的浸润性癌有较为明显的治疗决策改变。结论 21基因检测可为早期乳腺癌患者辅助化疗的选择提供参考;分子分型与组织学分级是影响21基因RS的独立影响因素。 Objective To explore the association of 21 gene recurrence score with clinical pathological characteristics and the selection of adjuvant chemotherapeutic strategy. Methods The retrospective study was performed among luminal breast cancer patients from October 2016 to April 2018. Real-time PCR was used for 21 genome detection after RNA extraction, including 16 breast cancer-related genes and 5 reference genes. Patients were enrolled into low risk, moderate risk and high risk groups, based on the calculated RS(recurrence score). Single-factor and logistic analysis were proceeded to investigate the correlation between RS and clinic-pathological features of participants. Besides, the influence of RS level on the decision of adjuvant chemotherapy strategy was also studied. Results 162 luminal breast cancer patients were enrolled. Based on the RS score, patients were grouped into lower risk 51(13.88±2.93, 31.5%), intermediate risk 80(22.42±3.70, 49.4%) and high risk groups 31(35.92±3.17, 16.1%). Single-factor analysis indicated that tumor size(χ^2=11.528,P=0.001), Ki67(χ^2=8.273,P=0.016), molecular subtype(χ^2=8.864,P=0.003), CK5/6 expression(χ^2=30.915,P<0.001), and histological grade(χ^2=19.513,P<0.001) were all affected the risk of recurrence. Logistic analysis results showed the significance of tumor size(β=1.175,SD=0.467,Wald=6.322,P=0.012,OR=3.238,95%CI:1.296-8.093) and histological grade(β=0.671,SD=0.315,Wald=4.541,P=0.033,OR=1.957,95%CI:1.055-3.629). Besides, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate/high risk groups was higher(χ^2=37.164,P<0.001),while people receiving endocrine therapy was lower than lower group(χ^2=100.309,P<0.001). For radiotherapy treatment, patients in lower risk group prefer to accept endocrine therapy(χ^2=11.388,P=0.001). Conclusion Molecular subtype and histological grade were independent factors to 21 gene recurrence score, which could provide guidance to early breast cancer patients with positive expression of estrogen receptor.
作者 杨玉庆 黄美玲 李南林 魏洪亮 杨继鑫 凌瑞 YANG Yuqing;HUANG Meiling;LI Nanlin;WEI Hongliang;YANG Jixin;LING Rui(Department of Thyroid, Breast and Vascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University,Xi'an 710032,China)
出处 《西部医学》 2019年第7期1030-1033,1042,共5页 Medical Journal of West China
基金 国家自然科学基金(81572917)
关键词 21基因 乳腺癌 复发风险 预测 21-gene Oncotype Dx Breast cancer Recurrence Prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献42

  • 1Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer [ J]. N Engl J Med ,2004,351 (27) :2817-2826.
  • 2Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oneol,2006,24(23) :3726-3734.
  • 3Paik S. Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen [ J ]. Oneologist,2007,12 (6) :631-635.
  • 4Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, et al. Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of loeoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20 [ J ]. J Clin Oneo1,2010,28 (10) : 1677-1683.
  • 5Toi M, Iwata H, Yamanaka T, et al. Clinical significance of the 21-gene signature (Oneotype DX) in hormone receptor-positive early stage primary breast cancer in the Japanese population [J]. Cancer,2010,116(13) :3112-3118.
  • 6Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, et al. Prognostic utility of the 21 - gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features [ J J. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26 ( 25 ) : 4063 -4071.
  • 7Williams DJ, Cohen C, Darrow M, et al. Proliferation ( Ki-67 and phosphohistone H3) and oncotype DX recurrence score in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [ J ]. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morpho1,2011,19 (5) :431-436.
  • 8Schneider JG, Khiali D. Why does Oncotype DX recurrence score reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2012,134 (3) : 1125-1132.
  • 9Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen : a TransATAC study [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2010,28( 11 ) :1829-1834.
  • 10Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial [ J ]. Lancet Onco1,2010,11 ( 1 ) :55-65.

共引文献978

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部