摘要
目的:对腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与传统疝修补术手术术后疼痛及复发率进行比较分析,探讨其优缺点.方法:选取64例腹股沟疝患者,分为常规组(32例)与对照组(32例),给予常规组传统疝修补术治疗,给予对照组腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术治疗.对比两组患者的疼痛程度、复发率.结果:对照组患者的术后1d与术后3d的疼痛评分均低于常规组(P<0.05),两组患者的术后复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:使用腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术对腹部沟疝患者进行治疗,降低了疼痛程度.
Objective: To compare and analyze the postoperative pain and recurrence rate of extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia wood and traditional heart repair wood and hand wood, and to explore the advantages and disadvantages. Methods: a total of 64 patients with inguinal hernia were selected and divided into the conventional group(32 cases)and the intervention group (32 cases).The pain degree and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The pain scores of the patients in the control group were lower than those in the routine group (P< 0.05),There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion:Extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty can reduce pain in patients with abdominal inguinal hernia.
作者
汪鸿波
李永
李立华
WANG Hong-bo;LI Yong;LI Li-hua(Fengtai People's Hospital,Huainan 232100,Anhui)
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2019年第3期60-61,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词
腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术
传统疝修补术
Extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy
Traditional herniorrhaphy
