摘要
采用元分析方法探讨领导风格与敬业度的关系。经筛选,共有148 篇文献162 个独立样本符合元分析标准(N = 84836)。元分析结果发现,授权型领导、伦理型领导、变革型领导、领导-成员交换、真实型领导、交易型领导、服务型领导以及家长式领导与敬业度之间均呈显著的正相关关系,且对敬业度的解释力递减;不同的敬业度量表对领导?成员交换、真实型领导与敬业度之间的关系有显著的调节作用, UWES 为中等正相关,其他量表为高等正相关;不同的研究设计对伦理型领导与敬业度的关系调节作用显著,横截面研究设计测得的相关程度比纵向研究高;文化背景能够显著调节变革型领导、领导-成员交换、真实型领导、伦理型领导、服务型领导以及交易型领导与敬业度之间的关系,除服务型领导外,东方文化背景下的相关系数均比西方文化背景下高。
This article fills the void in leadership and engagement literature through conducting a quantitative review to explore the disparities among relationships between different leadership styles and engagement. Based on a meta-analysis of 148 cases and 162 independent effect sizes (N = 84836). We found positive associations between various leadership styles and engagement, and the results of relative weights analysis suggest that engagement was decrementally predicted by empowering leadership, ethical leadership, transformational leadership, leader-member exchange, authentic leadership, transactional leadership, servant leadership and paternalistic leadership. Moderator analyses revealed that the particular engagement scale, design of research and cultural background all produce meaningful influences on the relationships in the meta-analysis.
作者
胥彦
李超平
XU Yan;LI Chaoping(School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;Management Institude of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, China)
出处
《心理科学进展》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第8期1363-1383,共21页
Advances in Psychological Science
基金
国家自然科学基金资助(71772171,71372159)
教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目资助(17YJA630073)
中国人民大学“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”支持
关键词
变革型领导
领导-成员交换
真实型领导
敬业度
元分析
transformational leadership
leader-member exchange
authentic leadership
engagement
meta-analysis
