摘要
对于钟嵘《诗品》论郭璞诗歌与玄言诗的关系,以及评郭璞《游仙诗》,后人的理解颇有分歧,也含有某些误解。本文通过具体解读《诗品》,认为钟嵘没有误叙玄言诗衍化与郭璞诗歌“创变”的相互关系;他承檀道鸾、沈约、刘勰的看法而更添自己心得,首次将郭璞、刘琨视为与早期玄言诗风相抗争之合力;他一方面肯定郭璞《游仙诗》为杰作,另一方面对其不合“游仙诗”体制略示不满,这反映了他重文体的思想。“微词”和“褒语”互见,避免判断偏颇,这是《诗品》开展评论的基本态度,以此也显出钟嵘对郭璞诗歌的完整认识。
Scholars tend to have varied understandings, even misunderstandings, toward how the relation between Guo Pu’s poems and metaphysical verse (xuanyan shi) and how Guo’s Poem on Roaming in Transcendence was evaluated in Treaties on Poetry compiled by Zhong Rong. In this article, through a specific interpretation into Treaties on Poetry , the author reveals Zhong Rong didn’t make a misstatement on the interplay between the evolution of metaphysical verse and the “innovation” in Guo Pu’s poems. Inheriting Tan Daoluan, Shen Yue and Liu Xie, and combining their opinions with his own insights, Zhong Rong for the first time considered Guo Pu and Liu Kun as the joint force to combat early metaphysical verse. On the one hand, he acknowledged Guo Pu’s Poem on Roaming in Transcendence as a marvelous piece;and on the other, expressed certain discontentment regarding the fact that it didn’t fully comply with the pattern of this type of poems, casting light on his emphasized value on “literary form”. Veiled criticism mingled with commendations helped avoid biased judgment, which laid the foundation for the critical spirit of Treaties on Poetry and demonstrated Zhong’s well-development and holistic view on Guo Pu’s poems.
作者
邬国平
WU Guo-ping(Institute of Chinese Language and Literature, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)
出处
《许昌学院学报》
CAS
2019年第4期34-40,共7页
Journal of Xuchang University
关键词
钟嵘《诗品》
郭璞《游仙诗》
玄言诗风衍演变化
Zhong Rong
Treaties on Poetry
Guo Pu
Poem on Roaming in Transcendence
evolution of metaphysical verse (xuanyan shi)
