期刊文献+

粮食补贴政策的中美比较、效应评价及我国补贴建议 被引量:12

Sino-US Comparisons,Effectiveness Evaluation and Subsidies Suggestions for China’s Grain Subsidy Policies
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国与作为国际补贴政策代表的美国相比,改革方向符合国际趋势,但是在某些方面还要加快推进,如绿箱补贴和非特定农产品补贴还没有充分利用,对市场价格支持的依赖还较大。通过经济效应分析发现,稻谷实行生产者补贴制度后,政府财政支出(不含存储费用)、黄箱补贴都会增加。为此,我国要预测并提前宣布稻谷、小麦的收购量并向农民发放销售配额,夯实生产者补贴通报为蓝箱补贴的条件,把生产者补贴部分转化为固定补贴,建立区际补贴公平机制和补贴合约等。 Through the comparative analysis of China’s grain subsidy policies and those of the United States,which is the representative of the international subsidy policy,it is found that the direction of reform conforms to the international trend,but in some aspects the reform should be accelerated,such as the green box subsidy and non-specific agricultural products subsidy have not been fully utilized,and the dependence on market price support is still large. By means of analyzing the economic effect,it is found that after the grain producer subsidy system is implemented in China,the government’s financial expenditure( excluding the storage costs) and amber box subsidy will increase. To this end,China should forecast and announce in advance the purchase amount of rice and wheat,and issue the sales quotas to the farmers. This is to consolidate the conditions for producer subsidy to be notified as blue box subsidy,transform part of the producer subsidy into the fixed subsidy,and to establish a fair mechanism of inter-regional subsidy and subsidy contracts.
作者 肖琼琪 王文涛 XIAO Qiong-qi;WANG Wen-tao(Chinese Academy of Financial Sciences, Beijing 100142, China;School of Business, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China)
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第4期68-75,共8页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目(14BJY133)
关键词 粮食补贴政策 效应评价 生产者补贴 市场价格支持 grain subsidy policy effect evaluation producer subsidy market price support
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献65

  • 1韩一军,柯炳生.巴西成功起诉美国棉花补贴的意义与启示[J].世界农业,2004(9):8-11. 被引量:4
  • 2唐清泉,罗党论.政府补贴动机及其效果的实证研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].金融研究,2007(06A):149-163. 被引量:400
  • 3Carmen G. Gonzalez. Institutionalizing Inequality: the WTO, Agriculture and Developing Countries. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law ,2002, Vol. 27.
  • 4FAO SYMPOSIUM ON AGRICULTURE, TRADE AND FOOD SECURITY: ISSUES AND OPTIONS IN THE FORTHCOMING WTO NEGOTIATIONS FROM THE PER- SPECTIVE OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. http: //www. fao. org/DOCR EP/meeting/x3065E. htm.
  • 5T. S. Jayne et al. Success and Challenges of Food Market Reform: Experiences From Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe. http://www, aec. msu. edu/age- con/fs2/papers/idwp72, pdf.
  • 6Ministerial Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Program on Least- Developed and Net Food- Importing Developing Coun- tries, http://docsonline, wto. org: 80/DDFDocuments/v/ UR/FA/35 - dag. doc.
  • 7胡敏华.我国农业保险体制的制度框架与政策选择[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28(6):718-722. 被引量:5
  • 8Qin,Julia Ya.The Challenge of Interpreting ’WTO-PLUS’ Provisions[J]. Journal of World Trade . 2010 (1)
  • 9WTO. WT/MIN (13)/38—WT/L/ 913 .
  • 10Eugenio Diaz-Bonilla.On Food Security Stocks,Peace Clauses,and Permanent Solutions after Bali. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01388 . 2014

共引文献90

引证文献12

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部