期刊文献+

审计报告中披露关键审计事项信息有助于提高审计质量吗?——报表盈余和市场感知双维度的经验证据 被引量:62

Does the Disclosure of Key Audit Matters in the Audit Report Contribute to Improving Audit Quality? An Empirical Study Based on the Two Dimensions of Earnings Quality and Market Perception
原文传递
导出
摘要 财政部批准发布的第1504号审计准则要求注册会计师在审计报告中沟通关键审计事项。本文基于我国新审计准则分步实施提供的准自然实验环境,采用PSM-DID方法研究了审计报告中披露关键审计事项对审计质量的影响,我们发现:关键审计事项的披露并未对财务报告层面的审计质量产生实质性影响,表现为公司操控性应计并未发生显著变化;但关键审计事项的披露对市场感知层面的审计质量产生了明显影响,表现为公司盈余反应系数显著上升。上述结果表明关键审计事项披露后,财务报告层面的审计质量与市场感知层面的审计质量发生了背离,不过进一步的检验发现,这种背离在更长时间窗口的观测中消失。本文结论对准则制定机构、市场监管者等多个市场主体的行为选择具有启示意义。 Auditing Standard No. 1504 which was approved and issued by Ministry of Finance (MOF) of China requires CPAs to communicate key audit matters ( KAM) in the audit report. The MOF's regulatory actions provide a unique quasi-experimental setting in which we can investigate the effect of the disclosure of KAMs on the audit quality. Our empirical results show that, from the perspective of earnings quality, the disclosure of KAMs has no effect on the discretional accruals, which means it does not substantially affect the audit quality;while from the perspective of market perception, the disclosure of KAMs leads to a significant increase of ERC, which means it improves audit quality. The conclusions suggest that additional disclosure in the audit reports has different influence on earnings quality and market perception. However, our further examinations find the KAMs' positive effect on ERC disappears in a long time window. The research findings have a great practical and theoretical value for many market entities such as standard setters, market supervisors and so on.
作者 张金丹 路军 李连华 Zhang Jindan
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期85-91,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71802177) 国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AJY002) 浙江省哲学社会科学基金一般项目(18NDJC136YB)的支持
关键词 关键审计事项 审计质量 报表盈余 市场感知 Key Audit Matters Audit Quality Earnings Quality Market Perception
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1夏立军,陈信元,方轶强.审计任期与审计独立性:来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2005,7(1):54-101. 被引量:58
  • 2刘峰,周福源.国际四大意味着高审计质量吗——基于会计稳健性角度的检验[J].会计研究,2007(3):79-87. 被引量:291
  • 3DeFond, M. and C. Park. 1997. Smoothing Income in Anticipation of Future Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (July): 115-139.
  • 4Francis J. R. , Maydew E. L. and Sparks H. C. 1999. The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theoryl8 (Fall) : 17 - 34.
  • 5Geiger M. A. and Raghunandan K. 2002. Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Mar.) : 67 - 78.
  • 6General Accounting Office (GAO) 2003. Public Accounting Firms: Required Study on the Potential Effects of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation, http: //www. gao. gov.
  • 7Heninger W. G. 2001. The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (January) : 111-126.
  • 8Mansi S. A. , Maxwell W. F. and Miller D. P. 2004. Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market. Journal of Accounting Research (Forthcoming).
  • 9Mautz R. K. and Sharaf H. A. 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association Monograph No. 6. Sarasota , FL : American Accounting Association.
  • 10Myers J. N. , Myers L. A. , and Omer T. C. 2003. Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings : A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? The Accounting Review 78 : 779 - 799.

共引文献536

同被引文献606

引证文献62

二级引证文献251

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部