摘要
标准必要专利的垄断包括标准制定过程中的垄断和标准实施过程中的垄断。在标准制定过程中,专利权人具有市场支配地位,实施了默示的遗漏或积极的欺骗行为隐瞒专利信息并最终排除或限制竞争,应当认定为构成垄断。反垄断执法机构对标准必要专利的反垄断审查应从主观因素、违反义务、因果关系三个方面进行。《反垄断指南(征求意见稿)》缺乏对标准必要专利制定中的垄断的规定,应完善对信息披露义务的规定并设立第三方专家监督机制,防止制定中垄断的产生。
The monopoly of standard-essential patents(SEPs) includes monopoly in the standard-setting process and monopoly in the implementation of standards. In the process of standard setting, the patentee, having a dominant market position, would implement implied omissions or positive deceptions to conceal the patent information and ultimately exclude or restrict competition, which should be considered as a monopoly. The monopoly review of SEPs by anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies shall be carried out in three aspects: subjective factors, breach of obligations, and causality. The Anti-Monopoly Guide (Draft for Comment) lacks regulations on monopoly of SEPs in standard-setting process. It should improve the provisions on information disclosure obligations and establish third-party expert supervision mechanisms to prevent monopoly in standard-setting process.
作者
杨怡红
Yang Yihong(College of Economic Law, East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050, China)
出处
《无锡商业职业技术学院学报》
2019年第4期51-55,共5页
Journal of Wuxi Vocational Institute of Commerce
关键词
标准
专利
反垄断
标准必要专利
市场支配地位
standard
patent
anti-monopoly
standard-essential patents
market dominance
