期刊文献+

利用超声造影评估高强度聚焦超声和子宫动脉栓塞治疗子宫肌瘤疗效差异 被引量:18

Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound to Evaluatethe Difference of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用超声造影探讨高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)和子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)治疗子宫肌瘤(UF)的疗效差异。方法:选择我院收治的接受HIFU或UAE治疗的UF患者68例(共81个UF)。术前、术后1周、术后3个月、术后6个月时测量UF体积,并通过超声造影观察UF的血流灌注情况。结果:①术后1周时,两组患者UF体积与术前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3个月、6个月时,两组患者UF体积较术前显著缩小(P<0.05);术前、术后1周、术后3个月及术后6个月时,两组患者UF体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1周、术后3个月及术后6个月,两组患者UF无灌注率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②在最大径≤5cm的49个UF中,两组患者各时间点UF体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),各时间点UF无灌注率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③在最大径>5cm的32个UF中,术后6个月时,UAE组UF体积较HIFU组小(P<0.05),术后1周、术后3个月及术后6个月时,UAE组UF无灌注率较HIFU组高(P<0.05)。结论:HIFU和UAE治疗UF均疗效确切,当UF最大径>5cm时,UAE疗效优于HIFU。 Objective:To investigate the difference of high-intensity focused ultrasound(HIFU) and uterine artery embolization( UAE) in the treatment of uterine fibroids(UF) using contrast enhanced ultrasound.Methods:A total of 68 UF patients(81 myomas) who were treated with HIFU or UAE in our hospital were selected.The volume of fibroids were measured before surgery, 1 week after surgery,3 months after surgery,and 6 months after surgery.Theperfusion of fibroids was observed by contrast- enhanced ultrasound.Results:①There was no significant difference ofthe volume of fibroids in the two groups 1 week after operation compared with that before surgery(P>0.05).At,3 months and 6 months after operation,the volume of fibroids in the two groups decreased compared with that before surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the volume of fibroids between the two groups before operation,1 week after operation,3 months after operation and 6 months after operation (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the rate of non-perfusion of fibroids between the two groups at 1 week,3 months and 6 months after operation(P>0.05).②Among the 49 UFs with a maximum diameter≤5 cm,there was no significant difference in the volume of fibroids between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of non-perfusion of fibroids at each time point(P>0.05).③In 32 UFs with a maximum diameter>5 cm,the volume of fibroids in the UAE group was smaller than that in the HIFU group at 6 months after surgery(P<0.05).At 1 week,3 months and 6 months after surgery,the rate of non-perfusion of fibroids in the UAE group was higher than that in the HIFU group(P<0.05).Conclusions:Both HIFU and UAE are effective in treating UF.When UF diameter>5 cm,UAE is more effective than HIFU.
作者 刘政 田锦 张惠 米成嵘 LIU Zheng;TIAN Jin;ZHANG Hui(Ultrasonic Department,General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University,Yinchuan Ningxia 750004,China)
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第8期633-638,共6页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 超声造影 高强度聚焦超声 子宫动脉栓塞 子宫肌瘤 疗效差异 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound High-intensity focused ultrasound Uterine artery embolization Uterine fibroids Difference in curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

共引文献58

同被引文献165

引证文献18

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部