期刊文献+

不同途径镇痛治疗对于癌痛患者用药安全性的护理策略分析

Analysis of effects of different routes of Morphine analgesia nursing strategy on drug safety in patients with cancer pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察吗啡通过两种不同途径治疗癌痛的效果以及安全性。方法:选取80例中晚期癌痛患者为研究对象。按照简单随机化法将患者分为观察组和对照组各40例。对照组口服吗啡,观察组皮下注射吗啡,均给药3次。比较两组患者疼痛缓解有效率、疼痛缓解的起效时间和最佳时间,以及患者并发症发生率。结果:观察组治疗有效率为95.0%(38/40),略高于对照组的90.0%(36/40),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组镇痛起效时间和最佳缓解时间明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);分别评定给药3次后VAS评分,观察组均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组不良反应发生率为30.0%(12/40),与对照组的37.5%(15/40)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:皮下注射吗啡对癌痛患者的镇痛效果好,起效时间快,安全性比较高。 Objective:To study effects and safety of two different routes of Morphine analgesia in patients with cancer pain.Methods:80 patients with advanced cancer pain were selected as the study subjects.According to the simple randomization method,these patients were divided into observation group and control group,40 cases in each.The control group received oral Morphine,while the observation group received subcutaneous injection of Morphine.The effective rate of pain relief,the onset time and optimal time of pain relief,and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The effective rate of the observation group was 95.0%(38/40),which was slightly higher than that of the control group(90.0%,36/40),and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The onset time and optimal time of pain relief of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group after three doses,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence rates of adverse reactions of the observation group and the control group were 30.0%(12/40)and 37.5%(15/40),respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions:For the patients with cancer pain,subcutaneous injection of Morphine can obtain a good analgesic effect with early onset and higher safety.
作者 李果 LI Guo(Two-way Referral Office of Nanyang Central Hospital,Nanyang 473000 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2019年第13期134-136,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 癌痛 吗啡 镇痛 安全性 Cancer pain Different routes of Morphine analgesia Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1郭环宇,王玲玲,景年财.以奥施康定为初始滴定治疗中、重度癌痛的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(12):3285-3286. 被引量:33
  • 2王昆.以整体的观念对待癌痛治疗问题[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2007,13(2):68-68. 被引量:12
  • 3Wiese CH, Loffier EK, Vomelker J, et al. Cancer pain therapy in palliative care patients: knowledge of prehos-pital emergency physicians in training: Prospective questi- onnaire-based investigation. Schmerz, 2010, 24:508 - 516.
  • 4Levitt ES, Purington LC, Traynor JR. Gi/o-coupled receptors compete for signaling to adenylyl cyclase in SH- SY5Y cells and reduce opioid-mediated cAMP overshoot. Mol Pharmacol, 2011, 79:41 - 467.
  • 5Liu YY, Sun LC, Wei JJ, et al. Tumor cell-released TLR4 ligands stimulate Gr-I+CD1 lb+F4/80+cells to induce apoptosis of activated T cells. J Immunol, 2010, 185:2773 - 2782.
  • 6Ikeda H, Chamoto K, Tsuji T, et al. The critical role of type-1 innate and acquired immunity in tumor immunotherapy. Cancer Science, 2004, 95:697 - 703.
  • 7Hamakawa T, Kurokawa Y, Takiguehi S, et al. Combin- ation chemotherapy using docetaxel. Cisplatin, and S-1 for far advanced gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2011, 38:2342.
  • 8Gill RS, A1-Adra DP, Nagendran J, et al. Treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal careinomatosis by cytor- eductive surgery and HIPEC:a systematic review of survival, mortality, and morbidity. Surg Oncol, 2011, 104:692.
  • 9Hong C, Lee H, Oh M, et al. CD4+ cells in the absence of the CDS+cytotoxic T cells are critical and sufficient for NKT cell-dependent tumor rejection.Immunol, 2006, 177:6747 - 6757.
  • 10Steppich BA, Moog P, Matissek C, et al. Ctyokine porifles and T cell fimction in acute coronary syndromes. atheorsclerosis, 2007, 190:443 - 451.

共引文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部