期刊文献+

审查逮捕听证程序研究 被引量:18

Research on Hearing Procedures for Detention Examination
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国逮捕实践中存在的批捕率高、羁押量大等问题,很大程度上为现行审查逮捕模式所致。审查逮捕作为一种司法性质的职能,不但应由司法机关行使,更应以司法化的方式行使。在我国刑事司法语境下,检察机关负责审查批捕存在理论与制度上的正当性。基于此,改革的关键在于将检察机关所进行的封闭式、行政化的逮捕审查引导至诉讼化轨道,以切实保障犯罪嫌疑人的基本权利,为辩护权的行使架设平台。目前,我国部分地区正在推进的审查逮捕听证程序探索,取得了一定成效;域外保释听证的司法实践,亦为逮捕司法化改革的进一步完善提供了有益经验。推进审查逮捕听证程序建设,应当在总结试点成效、借鉴域外经验的基础上,革新办案理念,确立检察官居中听审、侦辩两造对抗的诉讼结构,由检察官遵循客观中立的要求进行审查,并赋予被追诉人相应的救济权利,以此构建我国审查逮捕的正当程序。 There is a high rate and a large amount of detention in China’s legal practice,which is largely due to the current pattern of detention examination. As a judicial function,detention examination should be exercised not only by judicial authorities but also in a judicial manner. Under China's criminal justice system,it is legitimate in theory and in practice for procuratorates to be responsible for the examination. On this basis,the key to reform is to guide the enclosed and administrative examination conducted by the procuratorates tow ards the litigation path,so as to safeguard the fundam ental rights of criminal suspects and set up a platform for the exercise of the right to defense. Now hearing procedures for detention examination are being promoted in some regions in China,which has made some achievements. Meanwhile,the judicial practice of extraterrito rial bail hearings has also provided some useful experience for the further improvement of judicial reform in detention system. To promote hearing procedures for detention examination,on the basis of summarizing the achievements of pilots and using the experience from extraterritorial regions? we should reform the perception of handling cases,and establish a litigation structure in which public procurators are in the middle for hearings and investigators and counsels defend against each other,which means that public procurators should examine in an objective and neutral manner and that the prosecuted persons shall be granted their corresponding remedy rights,so as to build and improve the legitim ate procedures for detention exam ination system in China.
作者 周新 Zhou Xin
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第4期1025-1049,共25页 Peking University Law Journal
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“认罪认罚从宽制度改革研究”(项目编号:17BFX059)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 审查逮捕 听证程序 司法化 人权保障 捕诉合一 Detention Examination Hearing Procedures Judicialization Human Rights Protection Combination of Detention Approval and Prosecution
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

二级参考文献332

共引文献2593

同被引文献303

引证文献18

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部