传统手工艺工匠工作场所拓展性学习研究——基于《大国工匠》的案例分析被引量：2

Research on Traditional Craftsmen Expansive Learning in the Workplace——the Case Analysis Based on Great Country Craftsmen

下载PDF

导出

摘要随着社会的变迁及终身学习体系的构建,工作场所学习的价值愈发彰显。拓展性学习作为其中的一种学习类型,强调对学习过程的关注。以《大国工匠》中的传统手工艺工匠为案例进行分析,发现其拓展性学习过程主要表现为主体跨越最近发展区、在适应变革中实现边界跨越、在拓展客体中实现周期进化、在继承传统基础上追求创新。基于此,提出加强指向未来发展的学习内容、明确平衡传统与创新关系的学习动机、构建多重交互的学习方式等建议,以期增强传统手工艺工匠的当代实践水平和传承能力。 With the change of society and the construction of lifelong learning system.The value of workplace learning is becoming more and more obvious.As one of the types of learning,expansive learning emphasizes the attention to the learning process.Focusing on the case analysis of traditional craftsmen in Great Country Craftsmen,it is found that their expansive learning process is a process in which the subject crosses the recent development area,crosses the boundary in adapting to change,periodic evolution is realized in the process of expanding the object,and pursues innovation on the basis of inheriting tradition.Based on this,some suggestions are put forward,such as strengthening the learning content pointing to the future development,making clear the learning motivation to balance the relationship between tradition and innovation,and constructing a multi-interactive learning style in order to enhance the traditional handicraft artisan’s contemporary practice level and transmission ability.

作者高靖左璐 GAO Jing;ZUO Lu(Institute of Education,Qufu Normal University;Institute of Continuing Education, Qufu Normal University,Qufu Shandong 273165,China)

机构地区曲阜师范大学教育学院曲阜师范大学继续教育学院

出处《河北大学成人教育学院学报》 2019年第3期78-86,共9页 Journal of Adult Education College of Hebei University

基金山东省社会科学规划研究重点项目“中华优秀传统文化继续教育的路径与机制研究”(编号:18BJYJ03)

关键词拓展性学习传统手工艺工匠活动系统理论最近发展区边界跨越 expansive learning traditional craftsmen activity system theory the zone of proximal development boundary crossing

分类号 G710 [文化科学—职业技术教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1吴刚,洪建中,李茂荣.拓展性学习中的概念形成--基于“文化-历史”活动理论的视角[J].现代远程教育研究,2014,26(5):34-45. 被引量：29
2吴刚,洪建中.一种新的学习隐喻:拓展性学习的研究——基于“文化-历史”活动理论视角[J].远程教育杂志,2012,30(3):23-30. 被引量：45
3何爱霞,乐传永.从“边缘性参与者”到“充分参与者”的工匠工作场所学习研究[J].现代远程教育研究,2018,0(6):55-63. 被引量：15
4魏戈.拓展性学习:探索学习科学的新维度[J].现代教育技术,2019,29(5):19-25. 被引量：14
5魏戈.人如何学习——解读恩格斯托姆的《拓展性学习研究》[J].北京大学教育评论,2017,15(3):169-181. 被引量：32

二级参考文献58

1Illeris, K. (2011 a). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond [ M ], Beijing: Education science press, 61-62.
2Kuutti, A. (1996). Aetivity theory as a potential framework for hu- man-computer interaction research [J].In B.Anardi (Ed.), context and eonsciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 17-44.
3Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one[J].Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.
4Lave, J. &Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripher- al participation [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80.
5Illeris, K. (2011b). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond[M], Beijing: Education science press, 23-29.
6Engestr6m, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010a) Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges[J]. Educational Re- search Review, Vo15, 1-24.
7海伦.瑞恩博德.艾莉森.富勒,安妮.蒙罗著,匡英译.情境中的工作场所学习[M],北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011:159.
8Engestrom, Y. (2008).From Teams to Knots: Activity Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 100-101.
9Daniels, H. (2001a).Vygotsky and Pedagogy[M]. Routledge Falmer, 94-95.
10Engestrom, Y. (2009).Expansive learning: Toward an activity-theo- retical reconceptualization[J]. In Knud Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning.Routledge press. 51-73.