期刊文献+

Dissociation and disasters: A systematic review

Dissociation and disasters: A systematic review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND Dissociation,which is defined as the failure to associate consciousness,memory,identity,emotion,perception,body representation,motor control,and behavior into an integrated whole,has long been assumed to be generated by trauma.If dissociation is a product of trauma exposure,then dissociation would be a major mental health outcome observed in studies of disaster survivors.Although some studies have examined dissociation in disasters,no systematic literature reviews have been conducted to date on the topic.AIM To systematically evaluate the literature on the association between disaster and dissociation to determine the prevalence and incidence of dissociation after exposure to disaster and further examine their relationship.METHODS EMBASE,Medline,and PsychINFO were searched from inception to January 1,2019 to identify studies examining dissociative disorders or symptoms related to a disaster in adult or child disaster survivors and disaster responders.Studies of military conflicts and war,articles not in English,and those with samples of 30 or more participants were excluded.Search terms used were“disaster*”and dissociation(“dissociat*,”“multiple personality,”“fugue,”“psychogenic amnesia,”“derealization,”and“depersonalization”).Reference lists of identified articles were scrutinized to identify studies for additional articles.RESULTS The final number of articles in the review was 53,including 36 articles with samples of adults aged 18 and above,5 of children/adolescents under age 18,and 12 of disaster workers.Included articles studied several types of disasters that occurred between 1989 and 2017,more than one-third(38%)from the United States.Only two studies had a primary aim to investigate dissociation in relation to disaster and none reported data on dissociative disorders.All of the studies used self-report symptom scales;none used structured interviews providing full diagnostic assessment of dissociative disorders or other psychopathology.Several studies mixed exposed and unexposed samples or did not differentiate outcomes between exposure groups.Studies examining associations between dissociation and disaster exposure have been inconclusive.The majority(75%)of the studies compared dissociation with posttraumatic stress,with inconsistent findings.Dissociation was found to be associated with a wide range of other psychiatric disorders,symptoms,and negative emotional,cognitive,and functional states.CONCLUSION The studies reviewed had serious methodological limitations including problems with measurement of psychopathology,sampling,and generation of unwarranted conclusions,precluding conclusions that dissociation is an established outcome of disaster. BACKGROUND Dissociation, which is defined as the failure to associate consciousness, memory,identity, emotion, perception, body representation, motor control, and behavior into an integrated whole, has long been assumed to be generated by trauma. If dissociation is a product of trauma exposure, then dissociation would be a major mental health outcome observed in studies of disaster survivors. Although some studies have examined dissociation in disasters, no systematic literature reviews have been conducted to date on the topic.AIM To systematically evaluate the literature on the association between disaster and dissociation to determine the prevalence and incidence of dissociation after exposure to disaster and further examine their relationship.METHODS EMBASE, Medline, and Psych INFO were searched from inception to January 1,2019 to identify studies examining dissociative disorders or symptoms related to a disaster in adult or child disaster survivors and disaster responders. Studies of military conflicts and war, articles not in English, and those with samples of 30 or more participants were excluded. Search terms used were "disaster*" and dissociation("dissociat*," "multiple personality," "fugue," "psychogenic amnesia," "derealization," and "depersonalization"). Reference lists of identified articles were scrutinized to identify studies for additional articles.RESULTS The final number of articles in the review was 53, including 36 articles with samples of adults aged 18 and above, 5 of children/adolescents under age 18, and12 of disaster workers. Included articles studied several types of disasters that occurred between 1989 and 2017, more than one-third(38%) from the United States. Only two studies had a primary aim to investigate dissociation in relation to disaster and none reported data on dissociative disorders. All of the studies used self-report symptom scales; none used structured interviews providing full diagnostic assessment of dissociative disorders or other psychopathology. Several studies mixed exposed and unexposed samples or did not differentiate outcomes between exposure groups. Studies examining associations between dissociation and disaster exposure have been inconclusive. The majority(75%) of the studies compared dissociation with posttraumatic stress, with inconsistent findings.Dissociation was found to be associated with a wide range of other psychiatric disorders, symptoms, and negative emotional, cognitive, and functional states.CONCLUSION The studies reviewed had serious methodological limitations including problems with measurement of psychopathology, sampling, and generation of unwarranted conclusions, precluding conclusions that dissociation is an established outcome of disaster.
出处 《World Journal of Psychiatry》 SCIE 2019年第6期83-98,共16页 世界精神病学杂志
关键词 DISSOCIATION Dissociative disorders Disaster Systematic review Methodology Diagnostic validity PSYCHOPATHOLOGY NORMATIVE response POSTTRAUMATIC stress Association vs CAUSATION Dissociation Dissociative disorders Disaster Systematic review Methodology Diagnostic validity Psychopathology Normative response Posttraumatic stress Association vs causation
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部