期刊文献+

蒙特利尔认知评估在轻度认知障碍转化随访研究中的应用 被引量:4

Application of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Follow-up Study of Mild Cognitive Impairment Conversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:蒙特利尔认知评估在轻度认知障碍(MCI)转化随访研究中的应用。方法:选择2012年10月-2015年10月到笔者所在医院记忆门诊就诊的184例患者为研究对象,进行认知功能评估(MOCA)和临床资料收集,平均随访(2.70±0.80)年。根据纳入标准分为MCI组(99例)、正常组(30例)和AD组(55例),采用MOCA评估比较MCI转化的神经心理学变化特征。结果:MCI组随访MOCA总分较基线增加,AD组随访延迟回忆评分较基线增加,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MCI组有10例转化为AD,18例逆转为正常,71例保持MCI状态。转为AD组基线MOCA总分低于保持MCI组,保持MCI组基线MOCA总分低于转为正常组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。转为AD组基线视空间/执行力、延迟回忆、语言能力、定向力评分均低于保持MCI组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);转为AD组基线视空间/执行力、命名能力、延迟回忆、语言能力、定向力评分均低于转为正常组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。转为AD组随访MOCA总分较基线下降,转为正常组随访MOCA总分较基线增加,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。转为正常组随访延迟回忆评分较基线增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。保持MCI组和转为正常组随访MOCA各分项评分、基线MOCA各分项评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:MCI早期阶段的总体认知功能可发生好转甚至逆转为正常。视空间/执行力、延迟回忆、语言能力、定向力基线MOCA评分较低可以预测MCI转化为AD。MCOA作为MCI随访研究工具有一定预测作用。 Objective:To study the application of Montreal cognitive assessment in follow-up study of mild cognitive impairment conversion.Method:A total of 184 patients who visited the memory clinic of the author’s hospital from October 2012 to October 2015 were selected as subjects for the study.All patients underwent cognitive function assessment(MOCA)and clinical data collection.The average follow-up time was(2.70±0.80)years.According to the inclusion criteria,patients were divied into the MCI group(99 cases),the normal group(30 cases)and the AD group(55 cases).The neuropsychological characteristics of MCI conversion were evaluate by MOCA.Result:The total score of MOCA at follow-up in the MCI group was higher than that of baseline,and the delayed recall score at follow-up in the AD group was higher than that of baseline,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In the MCI group,10 cases converted to AD,18 cases reversed to normal,and 71 cases maintained MCI status.The total score of MOCA at baseline in the conversion AD group was lower than that of the maintenance MCI group,and the total score of MOCA at baseline in the maintenance MCI group was lower than that of the conversion normal group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Visuospatial/executive,delayed recall,language ability,and orientation scores at baseline in the conversion AD group were all lower than those of the maintenance MCI group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Visuospatial/executive ability,naming ability,delayed recall,language ability and orientation scores at baseline in the conversion AD group were all lower than those of the conversion normal group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total score of MOCA at follow-up in the conversion AD group was lower than that of baseline,and the total score of MOCA at follow-up in the conversion normal group was higher than that of baseline,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Delayed recall score at follow-up in the conversion normal group was higher than that of baseline,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Subscore of MOCA at follow-up and subscore of MOCA at baseline were compared between the maintenance MCI group and the conversion normal group,and the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:In the early stage of MCI,the general cognitive function can improve or even reverse to normal.Low scores of visuospatial/executive ability,delayed recall,language ability,and orientation at baseline can predict MCI converte to AD.MCOA as a follow-up study tool of MCI has a certain predictive effect.
作者 赵梅珍 徐晓云 张蔚 金磊 冯春花 ZHAO Meizhen;XU Xiaoyun;ZHANG Wei;JIN Lei;FENG Chunhua(Zhoupu Hospital in Pudong New Area of Shanghai,Shanghai 201318,China)
出处 《中外医学研究》 2019年第30期180-182,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 轻度认知功能障碍 蒙特利尔认知评估 阿尔茨海默病 神经心理学 Mild cognitive impairment Montreal cognitive assessment Alzheimer disease Neuropsychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献196

  • 1临床记忆量表编制协作组.临床记忆量表手册[M].北京:中国科学院心理研究所,1984,1..
  • 2Petersen RC,Smith GE,Waring SC,et al.Mild cognitive impairment:Clinical characterization and outcome.Arch Neurol,1999,56:303-308.
  • 3张明园,Elena YU,何燕玲.痴呆的流行病学调查工具及其应用.上海精神病学,1995,7:6,47.
  • 4Ritohie K,Artero S,Touchon J.Classification criteria for mild cognitive impairment a population based validation study.Neurology,2001,56:37-42.
  • 5Celsis P.Aged-ralated cognitive decline,mild cognitive impairment or preclinical Alzheimer's disease? Ann Med,2000,32:6-8.
  • 6Huang C,Wahlund LD,Almkvist O,et al.Voxel and voxel-based analysis of SPECT CBF in relation to clinical and psychological heterogeneity of mild cognitive impairment.Neuroimage,2003,19:1137-1144.
  • 7Davie JE,Azuma T,Golginger SD,et al.Sensitivity to expectancy violations in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment.Neuropsychology,2004,18:269-175.
  • 8Jacoby R,Oppenheimer C.Psychiatry in the elderly.2nd ed.Oxford:Oxford Medicine Publications,1997.37-62.
  • 9Pennanen C,Testa C,Laakoso MP,et al.A voxel based morphometry study on mild cognitive impairment.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2005,76:11-14.
  • 10Mosconi L,Tsui WH,De Santins,et al.Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD automated FDG-PET imagine analysis.Neurology,2005,64:1860-1867.

共引文献146

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部