期刊文献+

Primary Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation in Traumatic Cataract With Posterior Capsule Breaks 被引量:2

Primary Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation in Traumatic Cataract With Posterior Capsule Breaks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background:In patients with incomplete posterior capsule support,posterior chamber intraocular lenses(PC-IOLs)were implanted with both haptics transs-cleral fixation.This causes more damage to the eye and may result in more com-plications,In patients with small posterior breaks,non-fixation or single haptic fixation may be adequate.Methods:Thiry-two consecutive patients of traumatic cataract with posterior capsule breaks caused by penetrating eye trauma were retospected.Posterior chamber intraocular lenses were implanted in all these patients with three tech-niques,ie,without fixation,with single haptic fixation and with both haptics fixation .The selection of the technique was based on the position and size of the posterior capsule.The follow-up period was 21days to 28months(mean,15.2months).Results:Intra-operative problems included ciliary body bleeding(Two patents,6.25%)and enlargement of posterior capsule breaks(2patients,6.25).Postoperative visual acuity was0.5or better(Corrected)in28case(87.5%)and 0.1-0.4in four patients(12.5%),Postoperative complications included hyphema(6eyes,18.8%),transient intraocular pressure elevation(6eyes,18.8%),transient hypotention(7eyes,21.8%).Postoperative IOL position were good except one case of IOL tilt.No pupillary capture or endophthalmitis was found.Conclusions:Not all PC-IOLs have to be fixed by two haptics.In patients with small posterior capsule breaks,PC-IOLmay not be fixed or fixed by only one haptics.Eye Science1995;11:140-142. Background: In patients with incomplete posterior capsule support, posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC-IOLs) were implanted with both haptics transs-cleral fixation. This causes more damage to the eye and may result in more complications. In patients with small posterior breaks, non-fixation or single haptic fixation may be adequate. Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients of traumatic cataract with posterior capsule breaks caused by penetrating eye trauma were retrospected. Posterior chamber intraocular lenses were implanted in all these patients with three techniques, ie, without fixation, with single haptic fixation and with both haptics fixation. The selection of the technique was based on the position and size of the posterior capsule. The follow-up period was 21 days to 28 months (mean, 15. 2 months). Results: Intra-operative problems included ciliary body bleeding ( two patients, 6. 25% ) and enlargement of posterior capsule breaks (2 patients, 6. 25%). Postoperative visual acuity was 0. 5 or better ( corrected ) in 28 case ( 87. 5% ) and 0. 1 - 0. 4 in four patients ( 12. 5% ). Postoperative complications included hyphema (6 eyes, 18. 8%) , transient intraocular pressure elevation ( 6 eyes, 18. 8% ),transient hypotention (7 eyes, 21. 8%). Postoperative IOL position were good except one case of IOL tilt. No pupillary capture or endophthalmitis was found. Conclusions: Not all PC-IOLs have to be fixed by two haptics. In patients with small posterior capsule breaks, PC-IOL may not be fixed or fixed by only one haptics. Eye Science 1995; 11, 140- 142. .
出处 《眼科学报》 1995年第3期140-142,共3页 Eye Science
关键词 外伤性白内障 后囊破裂 人工晶状体植入术 手术方式 lens capsule,injury, intraocular lens
  • 相关文献

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部