微型种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸治疗中的效果及安全性被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探索分析在对青少年患者进行口腔正畸治疗时,应用微型种植体支抗的治疗质量评分与安全性。方法选择在2018年3月~2019年3月我院口腔科接受口腔正畸治疗的患者相关诊疗信息,并提取其中的86例青少年患者进行此次的实验研究,依据患者接受治疗的时间将患者分成对照组与实验组,每组中有患者43例。采用不同的治疗方法对患者进行治疗,对照组患者采用常规的正畸治疗,实验组患者采用微型种植体支抗治疗方式,并在治疗后依据患者在临床中的具体表现,统计治疗的效果以及患者不良发应发生情况。结果与对照组患者相对比,实验组患者的治疗质量评分更加的显著,不良反应发生几率更低,数据信息对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对青少年患者口腔正畸治疗时,微型种植体支抗治疗方法的治疗质量评分显著,并且可以有效的降低患者产不良反应的几率,治疗安全性较高,提高患者的生活质量等,在临床治疗中具有应用优势。

作者张义仁

机构地区重庆市彭水县人民医院

出处《全科口腔医学电子杂志》 2019年第29期42-42,共1页 Electronic Journal of General Stomatology

关键词微型种植体支抗青少年口腔正畸效果与安全性

分类号 R783.5 [医药卫生—口腔医学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1刘泽忠.微型种植体支抗和非种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸治疗中的效果对比[J].中外医疗,2016,35(8):90-91. 被引量：21
2孙洁,邓立兰,凌燕,魏永亮,史聪翀.微型种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸治疗中的效果及安全性[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(9):1742-1744. 被引量：74
3姜晓蕾,燕贵军,黄绪友,张正福,万淑红.微型种植体支抗在口腔正畸治疗中的临床研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(29):5661-5664. 被引量：30

二级参考文献32

1Srinivas N,Reddy G H,Rajvinder J.Evaluation of clinical efficiency of micro implant as an anchorage in comparison with conventional first molar anchorage[J].Journal of International Oral Health,2012,4(1):33.
2Lee SJ, Jang SY, Chun YS, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement after intrusion of a supraerupted molar using a mini-im- plant with partial-fixed orthodontic appliances[J]. Angle Orthodontist, 2013, 83(2): 274-279.
3Krasny M, Zadurska M, Cessak G, et al. Analysis of effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on teeth and oral tissues during orthodontic treatment. Report based on literature review [J]. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica: Durg Research, 2013, 70(3): 573-577.
4Pathak A K, Sharma D S. Biofihn Associated Microorganisms on Re- movable Oral Orthodontic Appliances in Children in the Mixed Den- tition [J]. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2013, 37 (3): 335-335.
5Estelita S, Janson G, Chiqueto K, et 8.1. Mini-implant insertion based on tooth crown references: A guide-free technique [J]. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2012, 41(1): 128-135.
6Rodriguez JC, Suaz F, Chart HL, et al. Implants for orthodontic an- chorage: Success rates end reasons of failures[J]. Implant dentistry, 2014, 23(2): 155-161.
7Tsui WK, Chua HI), Cbeung LK, et al. Bone anchor systems for or- thodontic application: A systematic review[J].International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2012,41(11): 1427-1438.
8Lin YS, Yu JH, Chang YZ, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an or- thodontic miniimplant used with revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experi- mental testing[J]. Implant dentistry, 2013, 22(1): 77-82.
9Wu TY, Kuang SH, Wu CH, et al. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan [J]. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2009, 67(8): 1595-1599.
10Morarend C, Qian F, Marshall SD, et al. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage [J]. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009, 136(2): 224-229.