摘要
普实克和夏志清的中国现代文学研究开启了迥异的学术思路和研究范式:普实克同 情中国革命,以社会历史分析的方法肯定中国现代文学的现实品格,褒赞鲁迅的历史功绩;而夏志清 受新批评派的影响,重视对作品自身价值的鉴别与评价,加上冷战背景和历史偏见,他的鲁迅研究实 践了去历史化和矮化鲁迅的诉求。两人的这种学术分歧经过1961-1963年的“普夏之争”得到了更 为鲜明的呈现。本文结合普夏结缘鲁迅的历史背景,追踪他们学术实践的理论资源,辨析“普夏之争” 中各自的鲁迅观和鲁迅研究的特点或局限,最后反思普夏两人的文学史写作与政治偏见、作者意图、 历史化之间的复杂关系。
C.T.Hsia and Jaroslav Prusek formed quite different academic ideas and research paradigms in the study of modern Chinese literature.Prusek sympathized with Chinese revolution,and affirmed the realistic character of Chinese modern literature by means of social-historical analysis.He thought highly of Lu Xun’s historical achievements.Influenced by the New Criticism,Hsia paid more attention to the identification and evaluation of the value of Lu Xun’s works.Also influenced by the cold war background and historical prejudice,he practiced the pursuit of de-historicization,and thus dwarfed Lu Xun’s accomplishments to some extent.The academic divergence between the two scholars was more distinct after“the Academic Disputes Between C.T.Hsia and Jaroslav Prusek”taking place between 1961 and 1963.Based on the historical background in which Hsia and Prusek began and conducted their Lu Xun studies,this paper traces the theoretical resources of their academic practice,identifies the characteristics or limitations of their respective views on Lu Xun and his works embodied in the“the Academic Disputes Between C.T.Hsia and Jaroslav Prusek”.Finally,this paper reflects on the complex relationship between literary history writing and political prejudice,authorial intention,and historicization through comparing Hsia and Prusek’s studies on Lu Xun.
作者
沈杏培
SHEN Xingpei(College of arts,nanjing normal university,nanjing 210097,China)
出处
《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期132-143,共12页
Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
普实克
夏志清
鲁迅研究
社会历史
新批评
作者意图
C.T.Hsia
Jaroslav Prusek
Lu Xun studies
socialhistory
New Criticism
authorial intention
