期刊文献+

不同解剖类型非血栓性髂静脉压迫综合征支架植入术后的疗效观察 被引量:15

The effect of different anatomy types of non-thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome after stent implantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价非血栓性髂静脉压迫综合征(NIVCS)的解剖特征对支架植入效果的影响。方法回顾性分析2016年6月至2018年1月上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院收治的80例NIVCS患者临床资料。结果57.5%患者为单重压迫,37.5%为双重压迫,5%为三重压迫,双髂静脉通道占27.5%。腔内手术成功率100%,平均植入支架直径(14.25±1.03)mm(12~16 mm),平均植入支架长度(84.25±11.45)mm(60~90 mm);一期通畅率98.7%,二期通畅率100%,水肿症状缓解率92.86%,溃疡治愈率100%。不同压迫类型植入的支架直径和长度之间无统计学差异(P<0.05);不同压迫类型及不同直径的支架随访通畅率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论支架植入治疗不同解剖特征NIVCS的效果相近且安全。 Objective To evaluate the effect of stent implantation with different anatomical features of non-thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome(NIVCS).Methods The clinical data of 80 patients with NIVCS treated in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital between June 2016 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Results 57.5%of the patients were single compression site,while 37.5%were double compression and 5%were triple compression,and 27.5%were bilateral iliac vein access.The success rate of endoscopic surgery was 100%,the average stent diameter was(14.25±1.03)mm(12~16 mm),and the average stent length was(84.25±11.45)mm(60~90 mm).The primary patency rate was 98.7%and the secondary patency rate was 100%;the relief rate of edema symptom was 92.86%,and cure rate of the ulcer was 100%.There was no significant difference between the diameter and length of stent with different compression types(P<0.05).There was also no significant difference in the follow-up patency rate between the different compression types and stents with different diameters and lengths(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of stent implantation on different anatomical features of NIVCS is similar and safe.
作者 黄家麒 刘晓兵 施慧华 陆信武 HUANG Jia-qi;LIU Xiao-bing;SHI Hui-hua;LU Xin-wu(Department of Vascular Surgery,Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200011,China)
出处 《中国血管外科杂志(电子版)》 2019年第3期195-198,共4页 Chinese Journal of Vascular Surgery(Electronic Version)
基金 上海交通大学医学院第九人民医院临+计划项目(JYLI201824) 上海交通大学医学院博士创新基金(BXJ201935)
关键词 非血栓性髂静脉压迫综合征 解剖特征 疗效 Non-thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome Anatomical feature Therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1Oguzkurt L, Tercan F, Sener M. Successful endovascular treatment of iliac vein compression (may-thurner) syndrome in a pediatric patient. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2006 ,29 :446-449.
  • 2Hurst DR, Forauer AR, Bloom JR, et al. Diagnosis and endovascular treatment of iliocaval compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg, 2001,34 : 106-113.
  • 3Raju S, Owen S, Neglen P. The clinical impact of iliac venous stents in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. J Vase Surg, 2002, 35:8-15.
  • 4Heijmen RH, Bollen TL, Duyndam DA, et al. Endovascular venous stenting in May-Thurner syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg,2001,42 :83-87.
  • 5Lamont JP, Pearl G J, Patetsios P, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoluminal venous stents in the treatment of the May-Thurner syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg,2002,16:61-64.
  • 6Virchow R. Uber die Erweiterung kleiner Gefasse. Arch Pathol Anat 1851;3:427-62.
  • 7Cockett FB, Thomas ML. The iliac compression syndrome. Br J Surg 1965;52:816-21.
  • 8Brinegar KN, Sheth RA, Khademhosseini A, Bantista J, Oklu R. lliac vein compression syndrome: Clinical, imaging and pathologic findings. World J Radiol 2015;7:375-81. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i1 1.375.
  • 9Butros SR, Liu R, Oliveira GR, Ganguli S, Kalva S. Venous compression syndromes: Clinical features, imaging findings and management. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20130284. doi: 10.1259/bjr. 20130284.
  • 10Porter JM, Moneta GL. Reporting standards in venous disease: An update. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:635-45.

共引文献70

同被引文献108

引证文献15

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部