摘要
从《侵权责任法》到《专利法修改草案(送审稿)》,再到最新颁布的《电子商务法》,“通知—移除”规则在专利领域不断发展与完善,但是网络服务提供者仍然需要充当“裁判者”的角色,承担本不应当承担的审查义务。因此,针对专利领域的“通知—移除”规则,应将网络服务提供者的地位由“裁判者”向“传声筒”转变,完善通知、转通知、反通知等程序设计和标准。
From the Tort Liability Law to the Draft Amendment to the Patent Law(Draft for Review)to the newly promulgated E-Commerce Law,the"notice-remove"rule is constantly developing and improving in the patent field,but the network service provider still needs to act as a"referee"and assume the review obligations that should not be borne.Therefore,for the"notice-remove"rule in the patent field,the status of the network service provider should be changed from the"referee"to the"sound tube",and the program design and standards such as notification,transfer notice and counter-notification should be improved.
作者
丁佳杰
DING Jiajie(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2019年第11期80-83,共4页
China Invention & Patent
关键词
“通知—移除”规则
专利侵权
转通知
反通知
"notice-remove"rule
patent infringement
transfer notice
counter-notification
