期刊文献+

被遗忘权中国适用论批判 被引量:3

Critique on the Chinese Applicability of the Right to be Forgotten
下载PDF
导出
摘要 被遗忘权自确立以来不断被发展,在世界上呈扩大趋势。被遗忘权的支持者认为这有利于保护个人隐私,体现了个人对社会交往的需求与希望获得重新开始的机会,是对可能出现的寡头互联网公司和强势政府的防范。然而,这些主张却遭到批评者针锋相对的强烈否定。被遗忘权面临的诸多争议说明中国目前不应当适用被遗忘权。原因在于,被遗忘权本身存在的难题无法解决,被遗忘权确立后将带来冲突和问题,具体包括与言论自由、公共利益的冲突,数据控制者自主删除信息与公权力行使的冲突,被遗忘权容易增加社会负担、迟滞科技进步与阻碍经济发展。 Since its establishment,the scope of the right to be forgotten has been expanded all over the world.The proponents of the right to be forgotten have their reasons.First,it is conducive to the protection of personal privacy.Also,it reflects the individual’s need for social interaction and hope for a chance to restart.Meanwhile,it is a guard against possible oligarchy Internet companies and strong governments.However,these claims have been strongly denied by critics.There are some reasons for China should not to adopt the right to be forgotten at present.First,there are many problems related to the right to be forgotten,which can not be resolved.Second,the conflicts between the right to be forgotten and freedom of speech and public interest should not be neglected.Third,data controllers that autonomously delete information is not always in accordance with the exercise of public power.Finally,the right to be forgotten may increase the cost of information acquisition,impede the development of information technology and hinder economic development.
作者 卓力雄 ZHUO Lixiong(Department of politics and law,Party School of the Central Committee of CPC,Beijing 100091)
出处 《长白学刊》 北大核心 2019年第6期69-77,共9页 Changbai Journal
基金 国家留学基金委国家公派留学项目(201807275007)
关键词 被遗忘权 个人隐私 个人信息 个人数据 The Right to be Forgotten Personal Privacy Personal Information Personal Data
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

  • 1王利明.隐私权的新发展[J].人大法律评论,2009(1):3-27. 被引量:64
  • 2王利明.公众人物人格权的限制和保护[J].中州学刊,2005(2):92-98. 被引量:157
  • 3齐爱民.中华人民共和国个人信息保护法示范法草案学者建议稿[J].河北法学,2005,23(6):2-5. 被引量:184
  • 4王利明等.《人格权法新论》,吉林人民出版社,1994年版,第441-442页.
  • 5刘建明:《大数据不是万能的》,《北京日报》2013年5月6日.
  • 6[英]维克托·迈耶一肖恩伯格著,袁杰译:《删除--数字时代里遗忘的美德》,浙江人民出版社2013年版,第6页.
  • 7Rosen. Jeffrey: " The right to be forgotten. " Stanford law review online 64 (2012): 88.
  • 8New research:Global attitudes to privacy online:http://www. bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/home/2013/06/new-research-global-atti- tudes-to-privacy-online.html.
  • 9Paul A B: "A right to delete? ",European Journal of law and Technology,2011(2) : 1-18.
  • 10European Union. 1995 Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) [EB/OL]. ( 1995 ) [2016-03-20]. http : //ec. europa, eu/ justice/ policies/ privacy/ docs/95 46-ce/ dir1995 46_part l _en. pdf.

共引文献533

同被引文献42

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部